rs377060857

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_153240.5(NPHP3):​c.105G>A​(p.Lys35Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00109 in 1,573,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP3
NM_153240.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.941

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHP3 (HGNC:7907): (nephrocystin 3) This gene encodes a protein containing a coiled-coil (CC) domain, a tubulin-tyrosine ligase (TTL) domain, and a tetratrico peptide repeat (TPR) domain. The encoded protein interacts with nephrocystin, it is required for normal ciliary development, and it functions in renal tubular development. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 3, and also with renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia, and Meckel syndrome type 7. Naturally occurring read-through transcripts exist between this gene and the downstream ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
NPHP3-AS1 (HGNC:24129): (NPHP3 antisense RNA 1)
NPHP3-ACAD11 (HGNC:48351): (NPHP3-ACAD11 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring NPHP3 (nephronophthisis 3, adolescent) and ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) genes on chromosome 3. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is thus unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 3-132722251-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-132722251-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 193504.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.941 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00103 (156/152098) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00601 (29/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0043. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 84 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 13 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NPHP3NM_153240.5 linkc.105G>A p.Lys35Lys synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 27 ENST00000337331.10 NP_694972.3 Q7Z494-1
NPHP3-AS1NR_002811.2 linkn.502C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 11
NPHP3-ACAD11NR_037804.1 linkn.209G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 45
NPHP3-AS1NR_152743.1 linkn.502C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPHP3ENST00000337331.10 linkc.105G>A p.Lys35Lys synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 27 1 NM_153240.5 ENSP00000338766.5 Q7Z494-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00103
AC:
157
AN:
151990
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00600
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00955
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00102
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00159
AC:
318
AN:
200076
AF XY:
0.00199
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000222
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000803
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00478
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000424
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00103
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00109
AC:
1553
AN:
1420944
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00128
AC XY:
902
AN XY:
707138
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000664
AC:
2
AN:
30142
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000830
AC:
35
AN:
42144
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00443
AC:
112
AN:
25254
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
36438
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00545
AC:
455
AN:
83538
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000498
AC:
19
AN:
38178
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00890
AC:
46
AN:
5168
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000726
AC:
799
AN:
1101032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
85
AN:
59050
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
95
190
286
381
476
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
32
64
96
128
160
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00103
AC:
156
AN:
152098
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00113
AC XY:
84
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000144
AC:
6
AN:
41530
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00190
AC:
29
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00346
AC:
12
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5144
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00601
AC:
29
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000189
AC:
2
AN:
10572
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00685
AC:
2
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00102
AC:
69
AN:
67958
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
7
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.494
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9
19
28
38
47
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00175
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000948
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00145
AC:
5
AN:
3470

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 03, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 26, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

NPHP3: BP4, BP7 -

NPHP3-related Meckel-like syndrome Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Kidney disorder Benign:1
Sep 07, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Jan 20, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nephronophthisis 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.90
PhyloP100
0.94
PromoterAI
0.043
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs377060857; hg19: chr3-132441095; API