rs377114166
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.12175G>T(p.Gly4059Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000211 in 1,613,740 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G4059G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.12175G>T | p.Gly4059Cys | missense_variant | Exon 48 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.12175G>T | p.Gly4059Cys | missense_variant | Exon 48 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000806 AC: 2AN: 248238 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000219 AC: 32AN: 1461614Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000165 AC XY: 12AN XY: 727100 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74298 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:2
The Gly3821Lys variant in TTN has not been described in the literature nor previ ously identified by our laboratory. This variant has been identified in 1/8208 o f European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Seque ncing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP). Computational analyses are limited or unavailable for this variant. In summary, additional information is needed to fully assess the clinical significance of the Gly3821Lys variant.
Missense variants in the TTN gene are considered 'unclassified' if they are not previously reported in the literature and do not have >1% frequency in the population to be considered a polymorphism. Research indicates that truncating mutations in the TTN gene are expected to account for approximately 25% of familial and 18% of sporadic idiopathic DCM; however, truncating variants in the TTN gene have been reported in approximately 3% of reported control alleles. There has been little investigation into non-truncating variants. (Herman D et al. Truncations of titin causing dilated cardiomyopathy. N Eng J Med 366:619-628, 2012) The variant is found in CARDIOMYOPATHY panel(s).
TTN-related disorder Uncertain:1
The TTN c.12175G>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Gly4059Cys. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.0029% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/2-179605785-C-A). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1838244:Tibial muscular dystrophy;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G;C1861065:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9;C1863599:Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure;C2673677:Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at