rs377225516

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate

The NM_000256.3(MYBPC3):​c.184A>C​(p.Thr62Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000234 in 1,601,734 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00024 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MYBPC3
NM_000256.3 missense

Scores

4
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:12B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.84
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYBPC3 (HGNC:7551): (myosin binding protein C3) MYBPC3 encodes the cardiac isoform of myosin-binding protein C. Myosin-binding protein C is a myosin-associated protein found in the cross-bridge-bearing zone (C region) of A bands in striated muscle. MYBPC3 is expressed exclusively in heart muscle and is a key regulator of cardiac contraction. Mutations in this gene are a frequent cause of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.17208287).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYBPC3NM_000256.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.184A>C p.Thr62Pro missense_variant 2/35 ENST00000545968.6 NP_000247.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYBPC3ENST00000545968.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.184A>C p.Thr62Pro missense_variant 2/355 NM_000256.3 ENSP00000442795 P4Q14896-1
MYBPC3ENST00000399249.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.184A>C p.Thr62Pro missense_variant 2/345 ENSP00000382193 A2
MYBPC3ENST00000544791.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.184A>C p.Thr62Pro missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 2/275 ENSP00000444259

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000217
AC:
33
AN:
152268
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000127
AC:
29
AN:
228228
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000137
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
123986
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000750
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000306
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000263
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000236
AC:
342
AN:
1449466
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.000232
AC XY:
167
AN XY:
719936
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000604
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000295
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000234
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000217
AC:
33
AN:
152268
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000255
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
74394
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000249
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000144
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000350
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000116
AC:
14

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 27, 2016- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityDec 06, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 22, 2023See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
not specified Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 05, 2017Variant summary: The MYBPC3 c.184A>C (p.Thr62Pro) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 3/5 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 14/54182 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002584 in ExAC and at 0.00014 (36/255866 chrs tested) in gnomAD. These frequencies do not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MYBPC3 variant (0.0010005). This variant has been reported in several HCM patients without strong evidence supporting causality. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as uncertain significance. Taken together, this variant is classified as VUS. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityDec 05, 2014Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. p.Thr62Pro (c.184A>C, T62P) in the MYBPC3 gene. Given the weak case data (reviewed below) we consider this a variant of uncertain significance. The variant has been seen in two cases of HCM (not including this patient's family). There is no segregation data available. Millat et al (2010) observed the variant in one HCM proband from their French cohort of 192 unrelated HCM patients. The patient did not have any other rare variants in MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, or TNNI3. Sam Baxter at LMM shared that they have seen this variant once before in a patient with HCM and classify it as a variant of uncertain significance. In silico analysis with PolyPhen-2 predicts the variant to be benign. Per communication from Sam Baxter at LMM their sarcomere-specific PolyPhen also predicts it to be benign. They report that benign predictions by this tool are accurate 89% of the time. This is a non-conservative substitution, changing a polar threonine to a non-polar proline (Grantham score is 38). The threonine at codon 62 is not well conserved across species (GERP score of 0.4; mouse, rat and frog have a lysine; chicken and zebrafish have an asparagine). I could find no other variants at this codon associated with disease and only one nearby variant associated with HCM (p.Thr59Ala (Niimura et al 2002)). In total the variant has been seen in 3 of 6682 published controls and individuals from publicly available population datasets. The variant was reported online in 3 of 4289 Caucasian individuals and 0 of 2193 African-American individuals in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset (as of March 25th, 2014). The phenotype of those individuals is not publicly available. The dataset is comprised of multiple cohorts, some of which were recruited from the general population, others were enriched for common cardiovascular disease. Note that other variants with strong evidence for pathogenicity have been seen at similar frequencies in this dataset so this does not necessarily rule out pathogenicity (Pan et al 2012). The variant was not observed in the following published control samples: 200 control individuals studied by Millat et al (2010). It is listed in dbSNP with submissions from NHLBI ESP and the LMM (rs377225516). -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineAug 25, 2017Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Thr62Pro vari ant in MYBPC3 has been reported in 1 individual with HCM (Millat 2010) and was i dentified by our laboratory in 1 Caucasian adult with HCM and 1 Caucasian indiv idual with teenage-onset DCM with LVH and conduction disease due to an alternate etiology. This variant has been identified in 34/116340 European chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSN P rs377225516). It was predicted to be benign using a computational tool clinica lly validated by our laboratory. This tool's benign prediction is estimated to b e correct 89% of the time (Jordan 2011). In summary, while the clinical signific ance of the p.Thr62Pro variant is uncertain, these data suggest that it is more likely to be benign. -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 15, 2024This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 62 of the MYBPC3 protein (p.Thr62Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs377225516, gnomAD 0.03%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (PMID: 20624503). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 42577). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthJan 11, 2024This missense variant replaces threonine with proline at codon 62 of the MYBPC3 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (PMID: 20624503, 32841044). This variant has been identified in 39/259624 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJun 09, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 02, 2023This missense variant replaces threonine with proline at codon 62 of the MYBPC3 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (PMID: 20624503, 32841044). This variant has been identified in 39/259624 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 4;C3715165:Left ventricular noncompaction 10 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 11, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014Low GERP score may suggest that this variant may belong in a lower pathogenicity class -
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 30, 2024The p.T62P variant (also known as c.184A>C), located in coding exon 2 of the MYBPC3 gene, results from an A to C substitution at nucleotide position 184. The threonine at codon 62 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been reported in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cohorts; however, clinical details were limited (Millat G et al. Eur J Med Genet., 2010 Jul;53:261-7; Alfares AA et al. Genet Med, 2015 Nov;17:880-8). This alteration has also been seen in an exome cohort, but cardiovascular history was not provided (Andreasen C et al. Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 2013 Sep;21:918-28; Dorschner MO et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2013 Oct;93:631-40; Amendola LM et al. Genome Res., 2015 Mar;25:305-15). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Left ventricular noncompaction 10 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 11, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
CardioboostCm
Benign
0.0030
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.12
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.080
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.60
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.18
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.72
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.74
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.66
T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.091
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.17
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.41
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.0
N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.33
Sift
Benign
0.10
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.10
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.30
B;.;.
Vest4
0.73
MVP
0.82
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
0.061
T
GERP RS
0.40
Varity_R
0.77
gMVP
0.64

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs377225516; hg19: chr11-47372898; API