rs377377367
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.4590G>A(p.Ser1530=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000806 in 1,612,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S1530S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.4590G>A | p.Ser1530= | synonymous_variant | 36/42 | ENST00000219476.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.4590G>A | p.Ser1530= | synonymous_variant | 36/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000800 AC: 2AN: 249908Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135660
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000685 AC: 10AN: 1460412Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 726504
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74376
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 17, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 09, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 21, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 05, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at