rs377416092

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1351A>C(p.Ile451Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000564 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000061 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.579

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 links:

ENSG00000260798 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000260798 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.13392499).

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 89 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5 link	c.1351A>C	p.Ile451Leu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1	P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317184.2 link	c.1168A>C	p.Ile390Leu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 15		NP_001304113.1	P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317185.2 link	c.-198A>C		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 10 of 16		NP_001304114.1	P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1	NM_001317186.2 link	c.-469A>C		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 10 of 15		NP_001304115.1	P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 link	c.1351A>C	p.Ile451Leu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4		P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152246

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000119

AC:

AN:

251472

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000736

AC XY:

AN XY:

135916

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000264

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000609

AC:

AN:

1461884

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000633

AC XY:

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000764

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000497

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152246

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74382

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000142

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000264

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000247

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:2

Aug 31, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CDH1 c.1351A>C (p.Ile451Leu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin-like domain (IPR002126) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 251472 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1351A>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (e.g. Tung_2015, Dorling_2021) and Colorectal Cancer (Pearlman_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 34250417, 25186627, 33471991). Six ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: five classified the variant as uncertain significance and one as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Oct 11, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Uncertain:2

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 451 of the CDH1 protein (p.Ile451Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs377416092, gnomAD 0.003%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer and/or colorectal cancer (PMID: 25186627, 34250417). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142788). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant¬†is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Jan 27, 2022

St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 c.1351A>C (p.Ile451Leu) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.022% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-41244246-C-T ). This variant has been reported in one female individual with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (PMID: 30311375): no criteria met. -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Jan 24, 2025

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25186627, 15235021, 22850631, 34250417) -

Nov 10, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 c.1351A>C (p.Ile451Leu) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with colorectal cancer (PMID: 34250417 (2021)) and early-onset breast cancer (PMID: 25186627 (2015)). In a large breast cancer association study, the variant was reported both in healthy individuals and individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/CDH1)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000031 (4/129184 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 03, 2024

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces isoleucine with leucine at codon 451 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer, but was also reported in healthy control individuals in a breast cancer case-control study (PMID: 25186627, 33471991). This variant has been identified in 4/282886 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Nov 18, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:1

Mar 17, 2024

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.17

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.41

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.96

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.20

T;T;T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.60

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.60

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.27

LIST_S2

Benign

0.75

T;T;D;D;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.018

MetaRNN

Benign

0.13

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.96

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.8

L;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.33

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.96

N;.;.;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.048

Sift

Benign

0.11

T;.;.;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.69

T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.018

B;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.40

MVP

0.65

MPC

0.26

ClinPred

0.040

GERP RS

2.2

Varity_R

0.085

gMVP

0.34

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over