rs3781619
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_000107.3(DDB2):c.602+807G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.261 in 151,674 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,454 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.26 ( 6454 hom., cov: 31)
Consequence
DDB2
NM_000107.3 intron
NM_000107.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.07
Publications
26 publications found
Genes affected
DDB2 (HGNC:2718): (damage specific DNA binding protein 2) This gene encodes a protein that is necessary for the repair of ultraviolet light-damaged DNA. This protein is the smaller subunit of a heterodimeric protein complex that participates in nucleotide excision repair, and this complex mediates the ubiquitylation of histones H3 and H4, which facilitates the cellular response to DNA damage. This subunit appears to be required for DNA binding. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group E, a recessive disease that is characterized by an increased sensitivity to UV light and a high predisposition for skin cancer development, in some cases accompanied by neurological abnormalities. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
DDB2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- xeroderma pigmentosum group EInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp
- xeroderma pigmentosumInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.632 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.261 AC: 39517AN: 151556Hom.: 6452 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
39517
AN:
151556
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.261 AC: 39537AN: 151674Hom.: 6454 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.270 AC XY: 20033AN XY: 74070 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
39537
AN:
151674
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
20033
AN XY:
74070
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
16156
AN:
41322
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
4184
AN:
15242
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
455
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
3347
AN:
5146
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
1129
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
3071
AN:
10434
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
43
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
10631
AN:
67936
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
447
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1356
2711
4067
5422
6778
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
396
792
1188
1584
1980
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1192
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.