rs3796130
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000174.5(GP9):c.466G>A(p.Ala156Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0129 in 1,566,356 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,507 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000174.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GP9 | NM_000174.5 | c.466G>A | p.Ala156Thr | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000307395.5 | NP_000165.1 | |
GP9 | XM_047447997.1 | c.466G>A | p.Ala156Thr | missense_variant | 2/2 | XP_047303953.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GP9 | ENST00000307395.5 | c.466G>A | p.Ala156Thr | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_000174.5 | ENSP00000303942 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0164 AC: 2492AN: 152196Hom.: 168 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0471 AC: 7662AN: 162702Hom.: 626 AF XY: 0.0411 AC XY: 3682AN XY: 89656
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0125 AC: 17669AN: 1414042Hom.: 1339 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0125 AC XY: 8786AN XY: 700190
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0163 AC: 2486AN: 152314Hom.: 168 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0183 AC XY: 1364AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 12, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20981092, 11758225, 27884173, 27291889) - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 14, 2014 | - - |
Bernard Soulier syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics | May 31, 2018 | This variant is interpreted as a Benign - Stand Alone, for Bernard Soulier syndrome, in Autosomal Recessive manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BP4 => Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). BA1 => Allele frequency is >5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes Project, or Exome Aggregation Consortium. BS2 => Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at