rs3810481
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001037335.2(HELZ2):c.6509C>T(p.Thr2170Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.176 in 1,607,588 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 30,713 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001037335.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HELZ2 | NM_001037335.2 | c.6509C>T | p.Thr2170Met | missense_variant | 11/20 | ENST00000467148.2 | NP_001032412.2 | |
HELZ2 | NM_033405.3 | c.4802C>T | p.Thr1601Met | missense_variant | 5/14 | NP_208384.3 | ||
HELZ2 | XM_024452006.2 | c.6593C>T | p.Thr2198Met | missense_variant | 9/18 | XP_024307774.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HELZ2 | ENST00000467148.2 | c.6509C>T | p.Thr2170Met | missense_variant | 11/20 | 1 | NM_001037335.2 | ENSP00000417401 | P1 | |
HELZ2 | ENST00000427522.6 | c.4802C>T | p.Thr1601Met | missense_variant | 5/14 | 1 | ENSP00000393257 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.140 AC: 21318AN: 151794Hom.: 2369 Cov.: 35
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.180 AC: 43810AN: 243100Hom.: 5872 AF XY: 0.183 AC XY: 24336AN XY: 133226
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.180 AC: 262212AN: 1455660Hom.: 28352 Cov.: 56 AF XY: 0.181 AC XY: 131111AN XY: 724072
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.140 AC: 21303AN: 151928Hom.: 2361 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.143 AC XY: 10623AN XY: 74268
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at