Menu
GeneBe

rs3813245

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.76720T>C(p.Tyr25574His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0229 in 1,613,320 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 526 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. Y25574Y) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.020 ( 51 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.023 ( 475 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

1
5
9

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:23

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.03
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, TTN
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004454404).
BP6
Variant 2-178569412-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178569412-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 47349.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178569412-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178569412-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0557 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.76720T>C p.Tyr25574His missense_variant 326/363 ENST00000589042.5
TTN-AS1NR_038272.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.2044-13160A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.76720T>C p.Tyr25574His missense_variant 326/3635 NM_001267550.2 P1
TTN-AS1ENST00000659121.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.417-28184A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0202
AC:
3076
AN:
152062
Hom.:
51
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00451
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0307
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0218
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0611
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00827
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0444
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0234
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0196
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0260
AC:
6457
AN:
247950
Hom.:
117
AF XY:
0.0246
AC XY:
3310
AN XY:
134486
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00498
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0338
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0619
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00616
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0472
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0233
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0258
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0232
AC:
33884
AN:
1461140
Hom.:
475
Cov.:
41
AF XY:
0.0228
AC XY:
16578
AN XY:
726846
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00407
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0320
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0144
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0635
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00682
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0483
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0224
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0218
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0202
AC:
3073
AN:
152180
Hom.:
51
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0206
AC XY:
1535
AN XY:
74390
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00450
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0218
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0613
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00766
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0444
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0234
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0194
Alfa
AF:
0.0225
Hom.:
99
Bravo
AF:
0.0186
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0262
AC:
97
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0244
AC:
94
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00525
AC:
20
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0207
AC:
170
ExAC
AF:
0.0262
AC:
3160
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0280
AC:
96
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0203
EpiControl
AF:
0.0219

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:23
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:11
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 23, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 07, 2012- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 11, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 15, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 29, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJan 16, 2019- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 06, 2013This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.15
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
Cadd
Benign
20
Dann
Benign
0.84
Eigen
Uncertain
0.44
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.47
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0045
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.78
D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.80
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.9
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Benign
0.40
T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.94
.;.;.;P;.;.;P
Vest4
0.24
MPC
0.41
ClinPred
0.030
T
GERP RS
4.5

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3813245; hg19: chr2-179434139; COSMIC: COSV60085260; API