rs3815156
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.7971-348A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.197 in 353,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,425 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042492.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neurofibromatosis type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
- Moyamoya diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.175 AC: 26579AN: 152028Hom.: 3040 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.213 AC: 42899AN: 200972Hom.: 5376 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.222 AC XY: 24201AN XY: 109098 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.175 AC: 26607AN: 152148Hom.: 3049 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.184 AC XY: 13651AN XY: 74366 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at