rs3858340
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004281.4(BAG3):c.1220C>T(p.Pro407Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.101 in 1,614,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9,406 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P407S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004281.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | NM_004281.4 | c.1220C>T | p.Pro407Leu | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000369085.8 | |
BAG3 | XM_005270287.2 | c.1217C>T | p.Pro406Leu | missense_variant | 4/4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | ENST00000369085.8 | c.1220C>T | p.Pro407Leu | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_004281.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.124 AC: 18793AN: 152078Hom.: 1335 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.118 AC: 29552AN: 251250Hom.: 2129 AF XY: 0.111 AC XY: 15079AN XY: 135836
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0984 AC: 143895AN: 1461834Hom.: 8066 Cov.: 79 AF XY: 0.0972 AC XY: 70708AN XY: 727216
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.124 AC: 18816AN: 152196Hom.: 1340 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.124 AC XY: 9240AN XY: 74408
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 12, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 19, 2012 | p.Pro407Leu in Exon 04 of BAG3: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 17.0% (636/3738) of African America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs3858340). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 20, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 02, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 04, 2017 | Variant summary: The BAG3 c.1220C>T (p.Pro407Leu) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 2/4 in silico tools predict benign outcome for this variant (Mutation Taster not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 13824/121204 control chromosomes (1012 homozygotes) from ExAC at a frequency of 0.1140556, which is approximately 2920 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BAG3 variant (0.0000391), thus this variant is a common benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have classified this variant as benign. In literature, this variant has been reported in one DCM patient who also carried a rare variant p.I206V and was classified as a known polymorphism (Ruppert_2013). Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6;C3151293:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 11, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at