rs3858340
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004281.4(BAG3):c.1220C>T(p.Pro407Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.101 in 1,614,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9,406 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.12 ( 1340 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.098 ( 8066 hom. )
Consequence
BAG3
NM_004281.4 missense
NM_004281.4 missense
Scores
5
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.50
Genes affected
BAG3 (HGNC:939): (BAG cochaperone 3) BAG proteins compete with Hip for binding to the Hsc70/Hsp70 ATPase domain and promote substrate release. All the BAG proteins have an approximately 45-amino acid BAG domain near the C terminus but differ markedly in their N-terminal regions. The protein encoded by this gene contains a WW domain in the N-terminal region and a BAG domain in the C-terminal region. The BAG domains of BAG1, BAG2, and BAG3 interact specifically with the Hsc70 ATPase domain in vitro and in mammalian cells. All 3 proteins bind with high affinity to the ATPase domain of Hsc70 and inhibit its chaperone activity in a Hip-repressible manner. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0016813278).
BP6
Variant 10-119676774-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-119676774-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44776.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-119676774-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.25 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | NM_004281.4 | c.1220C>T | p.Pro407Leu | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000369085.8 | NP_004272.2 | |
BAG3 | XM_005270287.2 | c.1217C>T | p.Pro406Leu | missense_variant | 4/4 | XP_005270344.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | ENST00000369085.8 | c.1220C>T | p.Pro407Leu | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_004281.4 | ENSP00000358081.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.124 AC: 18793AN: 152078Hom.: 1335 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
18793
AN:
152078
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.118 AC: 29552AN: 251250Hom.: 2129 AF XY: 0.111 AC XY: 15079AN XY: 135836
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
29552
AN:
251250
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
15079
AN XY:
135836
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0984 AC: 143895AN: 1461834Hom.: 8066 Cov.: 79 AF XY: 0.0972 AC XY: 70708AN XY: 727216
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
143895
AN:
1461834
Hom.:
Cov.:
79
AF XY:
AC XY:
70708
AN XY:
727216
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.124 AC: 18816AN: 152196Hom.: 1340 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.124 AC XY: 9240AN XY: 74408
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
18816
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
9240
AN XY:
74408
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
289
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
346
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
751
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
754
ExAC
AF:
AC:
13856
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
572
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 19, 2012 | p.Pro407Leu in Exon 04 of BAG3: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 17.0% (636/3738) of African America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs3858340). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 12, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 20, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 02, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 04, 2017 | Variant summary: The BAG3 c.1220C>T (p.Pro407Leu) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 2/4 in silico tools predict benign outcome for this variant (Mutation Taster not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 13824/121204 control chromosomes (1012 homozygotes) from ExAC at a frequency of 0.1140556, which is approximately 2920 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BAG3 variant (0.0000391), thus this variant is a common benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have classified this variant as benign. In literature, this variant has been reported in one DCM patient who also carried a rare variant p.I206V and was classified as a known polymorphism (Ruppert_2013). Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6;C3151293:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 11, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
B
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at