rs386833960

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BP6

The NM_004646.4(NPHS1):​c.766C>T​(p.Arg256Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000116 in 1,612,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R256Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00030 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000097 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NPHS1
NM_004646.4 missense

Scores

1
10
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.263

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHS1 (HGNC:7908): (NPHS1 adhesion molecule, nephrin) This gene encodes a member of the immunoglobulin family of cell adhesion molecules that functions in the glomerular filtration barrier in the kidney. The gene is primarily expressed in renal tissues, and the protein is a type-1 transmembrane protein found at the slit diaphragm of glomerular podocytes. The slit diaphragm is thought to function as an ultrafilter to exclude albumin and other plasma macromolecules in the formation of urine. Mutations in this gene result in Finnish-type congenital nephrosis 1, characterized by severe proteinuria and loss of the slit diaphragm and foot processes.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
NPHS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital nephrotic syndrome, Finnish type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Myriad Women’s Health, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.33311763).
BP6
Variant 19-35849310-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-35849310-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 56522.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NPHS1NM_004646.4 linkc.766C>T p.Arg256Trp missense_variant Exon 7 of 29 ENST00000378910.10 NP_004637.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPHS1ENST00000378910.10 linkc.766C>T p.Arg256Trp missense_variant Exon 7 of 29 1 NM_004646.4 ENSP00000368190.4
NPHS1ENST00000353632.6 linkc.766C>T p.Arg256Trp missense_variant Exon 7 of 28 5 ENSP00000343634.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000296
AC:
45
AN:
152164
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00373
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000233
AC:
58
AN:
249294
AF XY:
0.000266
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000875
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000972
AC:
142
AN:
1460572
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000124
AC XY:
90
AN XY:
726616
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000389
AC:
13
AN:
33456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000447
AC:
2
AN:
44710
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00101
AC:
87
AN:
86192
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52950
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5186
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000270
AC:
30
AN:
1111952
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000116
AC:
7
AN:
60300
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
20
29
39
49
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000296
AC:
45
AN:
152282
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000376
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000602
AC:
25
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00373
AC:
18
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.515
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
5
8
10
13
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000106
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000196
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000189
AC:
23

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Finnish congenital nephrotic syndrome Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
-
Juha Muilu Group; Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM)
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Mar 09, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Mar 07, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2016
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1
Jul 08, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: NPHS1 c.766C>T (p.Arg256Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Immunoglobulin subtype domain (IPR003599) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00023 in 249294 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0014 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in NPHS1 causing Nephrotic Syndrome, Type 1 (0.00023 vs 0.0034), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.766C>T has been reported in the literature as a non-informative genotype (second allele/zygosity not specified) and in at-least one instance as a presumed compound heterozygous genotype in cohorts of individuals with a variety of renal phenotypes such as congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS), unspecified nephrotic syndrome (NS), steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) (example, Heeringa_2008, Machuca_2010, Abid_2012, Sadowski_2015). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.045
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.13
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.77
D;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.29
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.55
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.081
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.88
D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.27
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.33
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.11
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.4
M;M
PhyloP100
0.26
PrimateAI
Benign
0.43
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.3
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.57
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.
Vest4
0.73
MVP
0.90
MPC
0.70
ClinPred
0.20
T
GERP RS
-4.2
Varity_R
0.47
gMVP
0.76
Mutation Taster
=72/28
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs386833960; hg19: chr19-36340212; COSMIC: COSV62286185; COSMIC: COSV62286185; API