rs387906690
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 1P and 1B. PP5BP4
The NM_004959.5(NR5A1):c.392C>T(p.Pro131Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000242 in 1,611,682 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004959.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NR5A1 | NM_004959.5 | c.392C>T | p.Pro131Leu | missense_variant | 4/7 | ENST00000373588.9 | NP_004950.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NR5A1 | ENST00000373588.9 | c.392C>T | p.Pro131Leu | missense_variant | 4/7 | 1 | NM_004959.5 | ENSP00000362690 | P1 | |
NR5A1 | ENST00000620110.4 | c.392C>T | p.Pro131Leu | missense_variant | 4/6 | 5 | ENSP00000483309 | |||
NR5A1 | ENST00000455734.1 | c.392C>T | p.Pro131Leu | missense_variant | 4/4 | 3 | ENSP00000393245 | |||
NR5A1 | ENST00000373587.3 | c.40-296C>T | intron_variant | 3 | ENSP00000362689 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000625 AC: 15AN: 240146Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000530 AC XY: 7AN XY: 132068
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000240 AC: 35AN: 1459342Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000289 AC XY: 21AN XY: 726002
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152340Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000268 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74494
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Spermatogenic failure 8 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Oct 08, 2010 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at