rs388862
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000320493.10(CFHR1):āc.523G>Cā(p.Glu175Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.131 in 959,468 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 50,301 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000320493.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFHR1 | NM_002113.3 | c.523G>C | p.Glu175Gln | missense_variant | 4/6 | ENST00000320493.10 | NP_002104.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFHR1 | ENST00000320493.10 | c.523G>C | p.Glu175Gln | missense_variant | 4/6 | 1 | NM_002113.3 | ENSP00000314299 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.163 AC: 11828AN: 72534Hom.: 1919 Cov.: 12
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.113 AC: 18709AN: 165808Hom.: 8981 AF XY: 0.112 AC XY: 10008AN XY: 89700
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.129 AC: 114031AN: 886852Hom.: 48367 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.132 AC XY: 58826AN XY: 444486
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.163 AC: 11862AN: 72616Hom.: 1934 Cov.: 12 AF XY: 0.160 AC XY: 5585AN XY: 34944
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 05, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at