rs397507263

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.1166C>A(p.Pro389Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000198 in 1,613,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P389?) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.07

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

BRCA2 (HGNC:):

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

PM5

Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr13-32332643-CCG-CT is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006443739).

BP6

Variant 13-32332644-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32332644-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 96762.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32332644-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1166C>A	p.Pro389Gln	missense_variant	10/27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.1166C>A	p.Pro389Gln	missense_variant	10/27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.797C>A	p.Pro266Gln	missense_variant	10/27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 linkuse as main transcript	n.1166C>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	9/26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

152104

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000408

AC:

102

AN:

250046

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000583

AC XY:

AN XY:

135592

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00318

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000825

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000205

AC:

299

AN:

1461680

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000303

AC XY:

220

AN XY:

727142

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00310

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

8.99e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000497

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000161

AC XY:

AN XY:

74418

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00415

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

ExAC

AF:

0.000495

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:17

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:6

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Jun 22, 2016	Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.1166C>A (p.Pro389Gln) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant is located outside of any known functional domain and 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 60/120896 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the South Asians, a frequency of 0.0036399 (60/16484). This subpopulation frequency is about 5 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (0.0007503), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of South Asian origin. The variant has been cited in 2 breast cancer patients without evidence of causality (i.e. co-segregation). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as Benign/Likely Benign. Taken together and based on the high allele frequency in the South Asian subpopulation in the ExAC database, this missense variant is classified as Benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Sep 15, 2022	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Nov 19, 2020	This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22752604, 26898890) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Mar 24, 2021	- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Benign:4

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)	May 01, 2012	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center	Jul 07, 2023	- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panel	curation	Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)	Jun 18, 2019	IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000287 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Jun 14, 2016	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Sep 18, 2018	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Oct 02, 2021	- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State	Nov 16, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Breast neoplasm

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

3DMed Clinical Laboratory Inc

Jun 24, 2017

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Feb 06, 2024

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

The BRCA2 p.Pro389Gln variant was identified in 3 of 674 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer and was not identified in 100 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Caminsky 2016, Juwle 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs397507263) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae and SCRP; as likely benign by six submitters; and as uncertain significance by one submitter), COGR, and UMD-LSDB (1x as unclassified variant). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, BIC Database, ARUP Laboratories, or the Zhejiang University database. The variant was identified in control databases in 103 of 245960 chromosomes (3 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0004, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: South Asian in 100 of 30696 chromosomes (freq: 0.003) and Other in 3 of 5476 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), while the variant was not observed in the African, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The p.Pro389 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms. However, four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and four out of five in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.12

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.45

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Benign

0.12

DANN

Benign

0.16

Eigen

Benign

-1.2

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.2

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.032

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.12

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0064

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.91

PrimateAI

Benign

0.22

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.62

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.23

Sift

Benign

0.44

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.51

T;T

Vest4

0.20

MutPred

0.19

Loss of ubiquitination at K385 (P = 0.0464);Loss of ubiquitination at K385 (P = 0.0464);

MVP

0.75

MPC

0.028

ClinPred

0.0034

GERP RS

-0.63

gMVP

0.087

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over