rs397514382
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 17 ACMG points: 17P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_ModeratePP5_Very_Strong
The NM_001370658.1(BTD):c.683T>C(p.Ile228Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000372 in 1,614,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I228L) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001370658.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- biotinidase deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Leigh syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTD | NM_001370658.1 | c.683T>C | p.Ile228Thr | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 4 | ENST00000643237.3 | NP_001357587.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251456 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74378 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Biotinidase deficiency Pathogenic:5Uncertain:1
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
- -
Variant summary: BTD c.683T>C (p.Ile228Thr), also reported as c.743T>C (p.Ile248Thr), results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2e-05 in 251456 control chromosomes. c.683T>C has been observed simple heterozygous, in the presumed or confirmed compound heterozygous state, or with 2 additional heterozygous variants (phase unknown) in individual(s) affected with clinical or biochemical features of Biotinidase Deficiency (example, Cowan_2012, Procter_2016, Jezela-Stanek_2022, Sharma_2024). In at least 1 individual, this variant was likely trans with a pathogenic variant. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function in patient confirmatory biochemical testing. The most pronounced variant effect results in <10% of normal activity in patient sample(s) (Cowan_2012). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 22698809, 26810761, 35627187, 36684547, 38299772). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 25037). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic. -
This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 248 of the BTD protein (p.Ile248Thr). This variant is present in population databases (rs397514382, gnomAD 0.003%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with biotinidase deficiency (PMID: 22698809, 26810761). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 25037). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt BTD protein function with a positive predictive value of 95%. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
The BTD c.743T>C; p.Ile248Thr variant (rs397514382) is reported in the literature in at least one individual affected with biotinidase deficiency who carried a second, pathogenic variant in BTD (Cowan 2012). This variant is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 25037), and is only observed on five alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database, indicating it is not a common polymorphism. The isoleucine at codon 248 is highly conserved, and computational analyses (SIFT, PolyPhen-2) predict that this variant is deleterious. Based on available information, this variant is considered to be likely pathogenic. References: Cowan TM et al. Increased incidence of profound biotinidase deficiency among Hispanic newborns in California. Mol Genet Metab. 2012 Aug;106(4):485-7. -
- -
not provided Pathogenic:1
The BTD c.743T>C (p.Ile248Thr) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with biotinidase deficiency (PMIDs: 26810761 (2016), 22698809 (2012)), including a newborn who also carried the Amish founder variant c.1330G>C (p.Asp444His) (PMID: 35627187 (2022)). The variant has been shown to result in low levels of biotinidise enzyme activity, however further experimental evidence is needed (PMID: 26810761 (2016), 22698809 (2012)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00002 (5/251456 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, this variant is classified as likely pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at