rs397514880

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):c.1700C>T(p.Ala567Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000447 in 1,612,258 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A567A) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000033 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.18

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.032351196).

BP6

Variant 9-132905878-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132905878-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 64843.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-132905878-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr9-132905878-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 24 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC1	NM_000368.5 link	c.1700C>T	p.Ala567Val	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 23	ENST00000298552.9	NP_000359.1	Q92574-1Q86WV8X5D9D2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC1	ENST00000298552.9 link	c.1700C>T	p.Ala567Val	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 23	1	NM_000368.5	ENSP00000298552.3		Q92574-1
TSC1	ENST00000490179.4 link	c.1700C>T	p.Ala567Val	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 24	3		ENSP00000495533.2		A0A2R8Y6S8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000158

AC:

AN:

152206

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00439

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000797

AC:

AN:

250844

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000443

AC XY:

AN XY:

135570

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000489

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000491

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000329

AC:

AN:

1459934

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000289

AC XY:

AN XY:

725964

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000134

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000126

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000162

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000315

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000158

AC:

AN:

152324

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74476

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000915

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000946

Alfa

AF:

0.000116

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000151

ExAC

AF:

0.000107

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 1

Benign:5

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 05, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 20, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Mar 20, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 23, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22161988) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Mar 13, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 01, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Other:1

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC1)

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: curation

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.078

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.30

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.31

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.53

D;.;D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.24

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.14

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.81

LIST_S2

Benign

0.85

.;T;T;T;T;.;.;.;T;T;.

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.087

MetaRNN

Benign

0.032

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.29

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

L;.;L;.;.;L;.;L;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.28

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.5

N;N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.24

Sift

Benign

0.16

T;T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.12

T;T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Polyphen

0.023

B;.;B;.;.;B;.;B;.;.;.

Vest4

0.30

MutPred

0.62

Loss of catalytic residue at A567 (P = 0.1301);.;Loss of catalytic residue at A567 (P = 0.1301);.;.;Loss of catalytic residue at A567 (P = 0.1301);.;Loss of catalytic residue at A567 (P = 0.1301);.;Loss of catalytic residue at A567 (P = 0.1301);.;

MVP

0.77

MPC

0.51

ClinPred

0.032

GERP RS

4.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.048

gMVP

0.32

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over