rs397515929

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000256.3(MYBPC3):c.1812C>T(p.Asp604Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000407 in 1,592,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00030 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00042 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

MYBPC3
NM_000256.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0150

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYBPC3 (HGNC:7551): (myosin binding protein C3) MYBPC3 encodes the cardiac isoform of myosin-binding protein C. Myosin-binding protein C is a myosin-associated protein found in the cross-bridge-bearing zone (C region) of A bands in striated muscle. MYBPC3 is expressed exclusively in heart muscle and is a key regulator of cardiac contraction. Mutations in this gene are a frequent cause of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

MYBPC3 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).

BP6

Variant 11-47341223-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-47341223-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 42571.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr11-47341223-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.015 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000302 (46/152314) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00911 (44/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00697. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 32 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYBPC3	NM_000256.3 link	c.1812C>T	p.Asp604Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 35	ENST00000545968.6	NP_000247.2	Q14896-1A5YM48

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYBPC3	ENST00000545968.6 link	c.1812C>T	p.Asp604Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 35	5	NM_000256.3	ENSP00000442795.1	Q14896-1
MYBPC3	ENST00000399249.6 link	c.1812C>T	p.Asp604Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 34	5		ENSP00000382193.2	A8MXZ9
MYBPC3	ENST00000544791.1 link	n.1812C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 19 of 27	5		ENSP00000444259.1	F5GZR4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000302

AC:

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00910

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000775

AC:

164

AN:

211488

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00101

AC XY:

115

AN XY:

114314

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000322

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00609

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000213

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000419

AC:

603

AN:

1440464

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000592

AC XY:

423

AN XY:

714464

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000350

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00658

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000227

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000419

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000302

AC:

AN:

152314

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000430

AC XY:

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00911

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000134

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000567

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Nov 20, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Asp604Asp in exon 19 of MYBPC3: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. Asp604Asp in exon 19 of MYBPC3 (allele freq uency = n/a) -

Feb 01, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jan 11, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Jul 15, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 25, 2022

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Dominant

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Sep 02, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.39

CADD

Benign

7.3

DANN

Benign

0.85

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over