rs397517047
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_004999.4(MYO6):c.2548C>G(p.Leu850Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004999.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- progressive sensorineural hearing loss-hypertrophic cardiomyopathy syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Leu850Val varia nt in MYO6 has not been reported in the literature nor previously identified by our laboratory. This residue is conserved across mammals though not in lower spe cies; however, do not suggest a high likelihood of clinical significance. It sho uld be noted that this lab has only sequenced the MYO6 in 61 Caucasian individua ls such that the full spectrum of benign variation has not yet been defined for this gene, increasing the possibility that this may be a benign variant. In summ ary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certain ty at this time; however based upon the arguments described above, we would lean towards a more likely benign role. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at