rs397517340
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.5660C>T(p.Thr1887Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00156 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 67 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). The gene CDH23 is included in the ClinGen Criteria Specification Registry.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022124.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Usher syndrome type 1DInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022124.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000965 AC: 147AN: 152286Hom.: 3 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00323 AC: 804AN: 249252 AF XY: 0.00440 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00162 AC: 2373AN: 1461704Hom.: 64 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00243 AC XY: 1764AN XY: 727134 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000965 AC: 147AN: 152404Hom.: 3 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00142 AC XY: 106AN XY: 74530 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at