rs397517622
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.55340C>T(p.Pro18447Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000033 in 1,608,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P18447A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.55340C>T | p.Pro18447Leu | missense_variant | Exon 286 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.55340C>T | p.Pro18447Leu | missense_variant | Exon 286 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151916Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000246 AC: 6AN: 243424 AF XY: 0.0000227 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000350 AC: 51AN: 1456236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000359 AC XY: 26AN XY: 724010 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151916Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74184 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:3
Missense variants in the TTN gene are considered 'unclassified' if they are not previously reported in the literature and do not have >1% frequency in the population to be considered a polymorphism. Research indicates that truncating mutations in the TTN gene are expected to account for approximately 25% of familial and 18% of sporadic idiopathic DCM; however, truncating variants in the TTN gene have been reported in approximately 3% of reported control alleles. There has been little investigation into non-truncating variants. (Herman D et al. Truncations of titin causing dilated cardiomyopathy. N Eng J Med 366:619-628, 2012) The variant is found in CARDIOMYOPATHY panel(s). -
The Pro15879Leu variant (TTN) has not been previously reported nor previously id entified by our laboratory. Proline (Pro) at position 15879 is not conserved in some mammals, increasing the likelihood that a change would be tolerated. Comput ational predictions on the impact to the protein are mixed (AlignGVGD = inconclu sive, SIFT = pathogenic), though the accuracy of these tools is unknown. Additio nal information is needed to fully assess the clinical significance of the Pro15 879Leu variant. -
Variant summary: TTN c.47636C>T (p.Pro15879Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the A-band of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.5e-05 in 243424 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.47636C>T has been reported in the literature in at least one individual affected with Cardiomyopathy. This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Dilated Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at