rs41269547
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_153717.3(EVC):āc.284A>Gā(p.Asp95Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00588 in 1,614,184 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153717.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVC | NM_153717.3 | c.284A>G | p.Asp95Gly | missense_variant | 2/21 | ENST00000264956.11 | NP_714928.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVC | ENST00000264956.11 | c.284A>G | p.Asp95Gly | missense_variant | 2/21 | 1 | NM_153717.3 | ENSP00000264956 | P1 | |
EVC | ENST00000509451.1 | c.284A>G | p.Asp95Gly | missense_variant | 2/12 | 1 | ENSP00000426774 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00543 AC: 826AN: 152198Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00609 AC: 1530AN: 251320Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00616 AC XY: 837AN XY: 135830
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00593 AC: 8670AN: 1461868Hom.: 39 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00588 AC XY: 4279AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00542 AC: 826AN: 152316Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00544 AC XY: 405AN XY: 74464
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 14, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 28, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 14, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 09, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Feb 13, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | EVC: BP4, BS2 - |
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Dec 04, 2019 | - - |
Nephronophthisis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sydney Genome Diagnostics, Children's Hospital Westmead | Oct 25, 2018 | This patient is heterozygous for a variant of unknown clinical significance (VOUS), c.284A>G p.(Asp95Gly) in the EVC gene. To our knowledge, this variant has not been previously reported in the literature. However, this variant has been reported in dbSNP (rs4126957) with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.0067 in the European American population (n=8600). In silico analysis (Alamut Visual v2.4) is inconclusive regarding this variant, Align GVGD, MutationTaster and KD4v predicts it to be benign whereas PolyPhen2 and SIFT predicts it to be pathogenic. Alamut v2.4 also predicts this variant does not affect splicing. - |
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome;C0457013:Curry-Hall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at