rs41272435
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_017780.4(CHD7):c.307T>A(p.Ser103Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0179 in 1,613,918 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 270 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S103S) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.018 ( 258 hom. )
Consequence
CHD7
NM_017780.4 missense
NM_017780.4 missense
Scores
8
10
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.98
Genes affected
CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), CHD7. . Gene score misZ 3.2193 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.9401 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with Kallmann syndrome, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia, CHARGE syndrome, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, Omenn syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008754194).
BP6
Variant 8-60741739-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60741739-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 95782.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-60741739-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr8-60741739-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.013 (1984/152274) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0191 (1298/68012). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0182. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 959 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1984 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD7 | NM_017780.4 | c.307T>A | p.Ser103Thr | missense_variant | 2/38 | ENST00000423902.7 | NP_060250.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD7 | ENST00000423902.7 | c.307T>A | p.Ser103Thr | missense_variant | 2/38 | 5 | NM_017780.4 | ENSP00000392028 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0130 AC: 1984AN: 152156Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1984
AN:
152156
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0123 AC: 3064AN: 249020Hom.: 31 AF XY: 0.0124 AC XY: 1672AN XY: 135120
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3064
AN:
249020
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1672
AN XY:
135120
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0184 AC: 26845AN: 1461644Hom.: 258 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0179 AC XY: 12994AN XY: 727096
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
26845
AN:
1461644
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
12994
AN XY:
727096
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0130 AC: 1984AN: 152274Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0129 AC XY: 959AN XY: 74468
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1984
AN:
152274
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
959
AN XY:
74468
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
76
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
106
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
21
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
145
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1399
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 23, 2017 | p.Ser103Thr in exon 2 of CHD7: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 1.70% (1123/66212) of European chrom osomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org ; dbSNP rs41272435). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 15, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 29, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Oct 16, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
CHARGE syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Sep 05, 2016 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 03, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
CHARGE syndrome;C3552553:Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 20, 2021 | - - |
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;T;T
Polyphen
B;.;.
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at