Menu
GeneBe

rs41273523

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_003126.4(SPTA1):c.4490G>A(p.Gly1497Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0157 in 1,613,718 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 230 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 19 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.016 ( 211 hom. )

Consequence

SPTA1
NM_003126.4 missense

Scores

1
2
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.75
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPTA1 (HGNC:11272): (spectrin alpha, erythrocytic 1) This gene encodes a member of a family of molecular scaffold proteins that link the plasma membrane to the actin cytoskeleton and functions in the determination of cell shape, arrangement of transmembrane proteins, and organization of organelles. The encoded protein is primarily composed of 22 spectrin repeats which are involved in dimer formation. It forms a component of the erythrocyte plasma membrane. Mutations in this gene result in a variety of hereditary red blood cell disorders, including elliptocytosis-2, pyropoikilocytosis, and spherocytosis, type 3. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0053780377).
BP6
Variant 1-158642929-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-158642929-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 258940.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=5, Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr1-158642929-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0129 (1959/152178) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0189 (1285/67998). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.018. There are 19 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 985 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 19 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SPTA1NM_003126.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4490G>A p.Gly1497Glu missense_variant 32/52 ENST00000643759.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SPTA1ENST00000643759.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.4490G>A p.Gly1497Glu missense_variant 32/52 NM_003126.4 P1P02549-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0129
AC:
1958
AN:
152060
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00299
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00548
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00793
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00922
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0337
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0189
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0100
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0140
AC:
3496
AN:
249130
Hom.:
34
AF XY:
0.0142
AC XY:
1916
AN XY:
135148
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00258
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00723
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0144
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00284
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0194
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0170
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0160
AC:
23330
AN:
1461540
Hom.:
211
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0157
AC XY:
11412
AN XY:
727070
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00206
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00707
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00319
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0303
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0139
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0129
AC:
1959
AN:
152178
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0132
AC XY:
985
AN XY:
74392
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00299
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00792
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00922
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0337
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0189
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00992
Alfa
AF:
0.0173
Hom.:
47
Bravo
AF:
0.0107
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0189
AC:
70
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0114
AC:
44
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00376
AC:
15
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0170
AC:
142
ExAC
AF:
0.0145
AC:
1756
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0206
EpiControl
AF:
0.0180

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 10, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29396846) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024SPTA1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 22, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicDec 20, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 13, 2024- -
Hereditary spherocytosis type 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Pyropoikilocytosis, hereditary Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Elliptocytosis 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.62
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
Cadd
Benign
17
Dann
Benign
0.78
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.49
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.76
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.78
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.92
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0054
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.98
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.47
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.8
D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.14
Sift
Benign
0.064
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.26
T;.
Polyphen
0.35
B;B
Vest4
0.23
MPC
0.075
ClinPred
0.075
T
GERP RS
0.0036
Varity_R
0.34
gMVP
0.14

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41273523; hg19: chr1-158612719; API