rs41273523
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_003126.4(SPTA1):c.4490G>A(p.Gly1497Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0157 in 1,613,718 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 230 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 19 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.016 ( 211 hom. )
Consequence
SPTA1
NM_003126.4 missense
NM_003126.4 missense
Scores
1
2
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.75
Genes affected
SPTA1 (HGNC:11272): (spectrin alpha, erythrocytic 1) This gene encodes a member of a family of molecular scaffold proteins that link the plasma membrane to the actin cytoskeleton and functions in the determination of cell shape, arrangement of transmembrane proteins, and organization of organelles. The encoded protein is primarily composed of 22 spectrin repeats which are involved in dimer formation. It forms a component of the erythrocyte plasma membrane. Mutations in this gene result in a variety of hereditary red blood cell disorders, including elliptocytosis-2, pyropoikilocytosis, and spherocytosis, type 3. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0053780377).
BP6
Variant 1-158642929-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-158642929-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 258940.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=5, Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr1-158642929-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0129 (1959/152178) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0189 (1285/67998). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.018. There are 19 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 985 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 19 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTA1 | NM_003126.4 | c.4490G>A | p.Gly1497Glu | missense_variant | 32/52 | ENST00000643759.2 | NP_003117.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTA1 | ENST00000643759.2 | c.4490G>A | p.Gly1497Glu | missense_variant | 32/52 | NM_003126.4 | ENSP00000495214 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0129 AC: 1958AN: 152060Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1958
AN:
152060
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0140 AC: 3496AN: 249130Hom.: 34 AF XY: 0.0142 AC XY: 1916AN XY: 135148
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3496
AN:
249130
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1916
AN XY:
135148
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0160 AC: 23330AN: 1461540Hom.: 211 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0157 AC XY: 11412AN XY: 727070
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
23330
AN:
1461540
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
11412
AN XY:
727070
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0129 AC: 1959AN: 152178Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0132 AC XY: 985AN XY: 74392
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1959
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
985
AN XY:
74392
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
70
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
44
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
15
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
142
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1756
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Dec 20, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 13, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 22, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 10, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29396846) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | SPTA1: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Hereditary spherocytosis type 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Pyropoikilocytosis, hereditary Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Elliptocytosis 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
T;.
Polyphen
B;B
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at