rs412777
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000089.4(COL1A2):āc.1446A>Cā(p.Pro482Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.355 in 1,613,478 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 102,569 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.35 ( 9610 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š: 0.35 ( 92959 hom. )
Consequence
COL1A2
NM_000089.4 synonymous
NM_000089.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.132
Genes affected
COL1A2 (HGNC:2198): (collagen type I alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha2 chain of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIB, recessive Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, idiopathic osteoporosis, and atypical Marfan syndrome. Symptoms associated with mutations in this gene, however, tend to be less severe than mutations in the gene for the alpha1 chain of type I collagen (COL1A1) reflecting the different role of alpha2 chains in matrix integrity. Three transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 7-94412625-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-94412625-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 254952.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-94412625-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.132 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.362 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL1A2 | NM_000089.4 | c.1446A>C | p.Pro482Pro | synonymous_variant | 25/52 | ENST00000297268.11 | NP_000080.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL1A2 | ENST00000297268.11 | c.1446A>C | p.Pro482Pro | synonymous_variant | 25/52 | 1 | NM_000089.4 | ENSP00000297268.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.354 AC: 53810AN: 151798Hom.: 9605 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
53810
AN:
151798
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.339 AC: 84941AN: 250452Hom.: 14823 AF XY: 0.341 AC XY: 46165AN XY: 135476
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
84941
AN:
250452
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
46165
AN XY:
135476
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.355 AC: 518539AN: 1461562Hom.: 92959 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.354 AC XY: 257137AN XY: 727086
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
518539
AN:
1461562
Hom.:
Cov.:
47
AF XY:
AC XY:
257137
AN XY:
727086
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.354 AC: 53826AN: 151916Hom.: 9610 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.353 AC XY: 26193AN XY: 74244
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
53826
AN:
151916
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
26193
AN XY:
74244
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
980
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 26, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Ehlers-danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type, 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 22, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta type III Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 22, 2021 | - - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta with normal sclerae, dominant form Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 22, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta type I;C0268335:Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta, perinatal lethal Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 22, 2021 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 04, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at