Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001079802.2(FKTN):c.166-6A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0102 in 1,545,974 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 162 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
FKTN (HGNC:3622): (fukutin) The protein encoded by this gene is a putative transmembrane protein that is localized to the cis-Golgi compartment, where it may be involved in the glycosylation of alpha-dystroglycan in skeletal muscle. The encoded protein is thought to be a glycosyltransferase and could play a role in brain development. Defects in this gene are a cause of Fukuyama-type congenital muscular dystrophy (FCMD), Walker-Warburg syndrome (WWS), limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2M (LGMD2M), and dilated cardiomyopathy type 1X (CMD1X). Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2010]
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 9-105601139-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-105601139-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 36140.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}. Variant chr9-105601139-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr9-105601139-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00852 (1298/152326) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0203 (98/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.017. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 660 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
-
- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
-
- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Aug 03, 2015
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
GeneDx
Dec 21, 2013
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Nov 29, 2012
- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
-
- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Athena Diagnostics
Dec 14, 2017
- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
-
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Jan 13, 2018
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Aug 17, 2015
- -
Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type A, 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Jan 13, 2018
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Ambry Genetics
Nov 16, 2015
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -