rs41281773

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000170.3(GLDC):c.1927-9A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00292 in 1,613,996 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

GLDC
NM_000170.3 intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.00007716

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0250

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

GLDC (HGNC:4313): (glycine decarboxylase) Degradation of glycine is brought about by the glycine cleavage system, which is composed of four mitochondrial protein components: P protein (a pyridoxal phosphate-dependent glycine decarboxylase), H protein (a lipoic acid-containing protein), T protein (a tetrahydrofolate-requiring enzyme), and L protein (a lipoamide dehydrogenase). The protein encoded by this gene is the P protein, which binds to glycine and enables the methylamine group from glycine to be transferred to the T protein. Defects in this gene are a cause of nonketotic hyperglycinemia (NKH).[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]

GLDC Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

glycine encephalopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
glycine encephalopathy 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
infantile glycine encephalopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
neonatal glycine encephalopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
atypical glycine encephalopathy
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

GLDC links:

ENSG00000296224 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000296224 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).

BP6

Variant 9-6558693-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-6558693-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 367184.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00177 (269/152180) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00331 (225/68024). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00295. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 124 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AR,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GLDC	NM_000170.3 link	c.1927-9A>G		intron_variant	Intron 16 of 24	ENST00000321612.8	NP_000161.2	P23378

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GLDC	ENST00000321612.8 link	c.1927-9A>G		intron_variant	Intron 16 of 24	1	NM_000170.3	ENSP00000370737.4		P23378

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00177

AC:

269

AN:

152062

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000459

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000656

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000566

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00331

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00175

AC:

440

AN:

251426

AF XY:

0.00183

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000695

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000785

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00295

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00228

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00304

AC:

4440

AN:

1461816

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00294

AC XY:

2141

AN XY:

727214

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000448

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00125

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000421

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000603

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00116

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00121

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00371

AC:

4124

AN:

1111940

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00187

AC:

113

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.464

Heterozygous variant carriers

211

422

633

844

1055

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

170

340

510

680

850

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00177

AC:

269

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00167

AC XY:

124

AN XY:

74396

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000458

AC:

AN:

41500

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000655

AC:

AN:

15274

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000288

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000622

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000566

AC:

AN:

10596

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00331

AC:

225

AN:

68024

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00143

AC:

AN:

2104

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00243

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00179

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycine encephalopathy

Benign:4

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 21, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Dec 07, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2020

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.77

CADD

Benign

6.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.70

PhyloP100

0.025

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.000077

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.012

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over