rs41281938
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_014290.3(TDRD7):c.1923G>A(p.Lys641Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0317 in 1,613,386 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,070 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014290.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cataract 36Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0441 AC: 6702AN: 152062Hom.: 199 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0288 AC: 7168AN: 249128 AF XY: 0.0287 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0304 AC: 44417AN: 1461206Hom.: 872 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0306 AC XY: 22212AN XY: 726920 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0440 AC: 6701AN: 152180Hom.: 198 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0424 AC XY: 3156AN XY: 74416 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cataract 36 Benign:2
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at