rs41282026

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The ENST00000316673.9(HNF4A):c.84G>A(p.Ala28=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00137 in 1,613,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00079 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

HNF4A
ENST00000316673.9 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.96

Variant links:

Genes affected

HNF4A (HGNC:5024): (hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha) The protein encoded by this gene is a nuclear transcription factor which binds DNA as a homodimer. The encoded protein controls the expression of several genes, including hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha, a transcription factor which regulates the expression of several hepatic genes. This gene may play a role in development of the liver, kidney, and intestines. Mutations in this gene have been associated with monogenic autosomal dominant non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type I. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants encoding several different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

HNF4A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).

BP6

Variant 20-44406092-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-44406092-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 36347.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=6}. Variant chr20-44406092-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr20-44406092-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.96 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000794 (121/152312) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00146 (99/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00122. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 61 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 121 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
HNF4A	NM_175914.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.84G>A	p.Ala28=	synonymous_variant	2/10	ENST00000316673.9	NP_787110.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
HNF4A	ENST00000316673.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.84G>A	p.Ala28=	synonymous_variant	2/10	1	NM_175914.5	ENSP00000315180		P41235-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000795

AC:

121

AN:

152194

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000753

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00146

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000876

AC:

220

AN:

251128

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000928

AC XY:

126

AN XY:

135790

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000884

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00165

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000815

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00143

AC:

2083

AN:

1460696

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00140

AC XY:

1019

AN XY:

726700

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000209

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000201

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000883

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00178

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000597

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000794

AC:

121

AN:

152312

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000819

AC XY:

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000753

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00146

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000876

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000892

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00125

EpiControl

AF:

0.00160

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Sep 04, 2018	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Apr 12, 2021	- -

Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	research	Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic	-	Potent mutations in HNF4A are associated with poor insulin secretion in response to hyperglycemia. Associated with MODY1. Patients initially respond well to sulfonylureas but eventually become insulin dependent. However, more evidence is required to ascertain the role of this particular variant rs41282026 in MODY, yet. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Aug 16, 2022	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 19, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Apr 19, 2021	- -

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 1

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing;curation	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 18, 2011	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Familial hyperinsulinism

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.66

CADD

Benign

1.4

DANN

Benign

0.87

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over