rs41293763

Variant names:

• chr10-121496734-G-A
• rs41293763
• NM_000141.5:c.1673-12C>T

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr10-121496734-G-A
• chr10-121496734-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_000141.5(FGFR2):​c.1673-12C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00222 in 1,610,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 (2 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 (11 hom.)
• Consequence: FGFR2 NM_000141.5 intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.0001020
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.0230

Genes affected

FGFR2 (HGNC:3689): (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor family, where amino acid sequence is highly conserved between members and throughout evolution. FGFR family members differ from one another in their ligand affinities and tissue distribution. A full-length representative protein consists of an extracellular region, composed of three immunoglobulin-like domains, a single hydrophobic membrane-spanning segment and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. The extracellular portion of the protein interacts with fibroblast growth factors, setting in motion a cascade of downstream signals, ultimately influencing mitogenesis and differentiation. This particular family member is a high-affinity receptor for acidic, basic and/or keratinocyte growth factor, depending on the isoform. Mutations in this gene are associated with Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Craniosynostosis, Apert syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and syndromic craniosynostosis. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2009]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
• BP6: Variant 10-121496734-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-121496734-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 298999.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-121496734-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00193 (293/151752) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00356 (17/4770). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00249. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 133 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 Mitochondrial gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FGFR2	NM_000141.5	c.1673-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 12 of 17	ENST00000358487.10	NP_000132.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FGFR2	ENST00000358487.10	c.1673-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 12 of 17	1	NM_000141.5	ENSP00000351276.6
FGFR2	ENST00000457416.7	c.1676-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 12 of 17	1		ENSP00000410294.2
FGFR2	ENST00000369056.5	c.1676-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 11 of 16	1		ENSP00000358052.1
FGFR2	ENST00000369058.7	c.1676-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 12 of 16	1		ENSP00000358054.3
FGFR2	ENST00000613048.4	c.1406-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 11 of 16	5		ENSP00000484154.1
FGFR2	ENST00000369061.8	c.1337-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 9 of 14	1		ENSP00000358057.4
FGFR2	ENST00000369059.5	c.1331-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 10 of 15	5		ENSP00000358055.1
FGFR2	ENST00000360144.7	c.1409-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 11 of 16	2		ENSP00000353262.3
FGFR2	ENST00000478859.5	c.989-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 11 of 16	1		ENSP00000474011.1
FGFR2	ENST00000429361.5	c.449-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 8	5		ENSP00000404219.1
FGFR2	ENST00000604236.5	n.*720-12C>T		intron_variant	Intron 11 of 16	1		ENSP00000474109.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00193 AC: 292 AN: 151662 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000557

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00321

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00173

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00356

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00641

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00275

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00385

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00227 AC: 569 AN: 250560 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00238 AC XY: 322 AN XY: 135448

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000432

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00333

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00279

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00353

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0000463

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00257

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00327

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00225 AC: 3284 AN: 1459132 Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00234 AC XY: 1701 AN XY: 725902

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000599

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00365

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00283

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00393

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.000113

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00223

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00282

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00193 AC: 293 AN: 151752 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00180 AC XY: 133 AN XY: 74086

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000556

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00321

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00173

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00356

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00277

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00381

Alfa AF: 0.00283 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00202

Asia WGS AF: 0.00144 AC: 5 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3

Oct 21, 2022

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 23, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

FGFR2-related craniosynostosis Benign:1

Jan 13, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Crouzon syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Isolated Coronal Synostosis Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Craniosynostosis syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Saethre-Chotzen syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.81
CADD	Benign	1.1
DANN	Benign	0.54

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.00010
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.0
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41293763; hg19: chr10-123256248; COSMIC: COSV100337516;