rs41299210
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_014915.3(ANKRD26):c.3384G>A(p.Lys1128Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0225 in 1,613,328 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 517 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 18 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.023 ( 499 hom. )
Consequence
ANKRD26
NM_014915.3 synonymous
NM_014915.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.465
Genes affected
ANKRD26 (HGNC:29186): (ankyrin repeat domain containing 26) This gene encodes a protein containing N-terminal ankyrin repeats which function in protein-protein interactions. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia-2. Pseudogenes of this gene are found on chromosome 7, 10, 13 and 16. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 10-27035066-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-27035066-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 260465.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.465 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0147 (2231/152280) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.022 (1496/67996). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0211. There are 18 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1035 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 2231 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANKRD26 | NM_014915.3 | c.3384G>A | p.Lys1128Lys | synonymous_variant | 24/34 | ENST00000376087.5 | NP_055730.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANKRD26 | ENST00000376087.5 | c.3384G>A | p.Lys1128Lys | synonymous_variant | 24/34 | 5 | NM_014915.3 | ENSP00000365255.4 | ||
ANKRD26 | ENST00000436985.7 | c.3381G>A | p.Lys1127Lys | synonymous_variant | 24/34 | 1 | ENSP00000405112.3 | |||
ANKRD26 | ENST00000675116.1 | n.1032G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/15 | ENSP00000501975.1 | |||||
ANKRD26 | ENST00000675349.1 | n.3113G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/9 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0147 AC: 2234AN: 152162Hom.: 18 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2234
AN:
152162
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0175 AC: 4350AN: 248588Hom.: 50 AF XY: 0.0181 AC XY: 2440AN XY: 134854
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4350
AN:
248588
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2440
AN XY:
134854
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0233 AC: 34081AN: 1461048Hom.: 499 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0233 AC XY: 16903AN XY: 726800
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
34081
AN:
1461048
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
16903
AN XY:
726800
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0147 AC: 2231AN: 152280Hom.: 18 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0139 AC XY: 1035AN XY: 74454
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2231
AN:
152280
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1035
AN XY:
74454
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
34
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 24, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | Variant was observed in a homozygous state in population databases more than expected for disease.Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder.A synonymous variant not located in a splice region.SubpopulationAllele FrequencyAllele NumberHomozygotesEuropean-Non Finnish (NFE)2.1788%112,95234European-Finnish (FIN)1.3103%21,44610Other (OTH)2.0923%6,0222Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)3.7685%10,00416African (AFR)0.5299%15,4740East Asian (EAS)0.0278%17,9600South Asian (SAS)2.4931%30,36436American (AMR)0.7595%34,3662 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Thrombocytopenia 2 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 17, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 06, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at