rs41299210

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_014915.3(ANKRD26):​c.3384G>A​(p.Lys1128=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0225 in 1,613,328 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 517 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 18 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.023 ( 499 hom. )

Consequence

ANKRD26
NM_014915.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.465
Variant links:
Genes affected
ANKRD26 (HGNC:29186): (ankyrin repeat domain containing 26) This gene encodes a protein containing N-terminal ankyrin repeats which function in protein-protein interactions. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia-2. Pseudogenes of this gene are found on chromosome 7, 10, 13 and 16. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 10-27035066-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-27035066-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 260465.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.465 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0147 (2231/152280) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.022 (1496/67996). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0211. There are 18 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1035 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 2231 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ANKRD26NM_014915.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.3384G>A p.Lys1128= synonymous_variant 24/34 ENST00000376087.5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ANKRD26ENST00000376087.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.3384G>A p.Lys1128= synonymous_variant 24/345 NM_014915.3 A2Q9UPS8-1
ANKRD26ENST00000436985.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.3381G>A p.Lys1127= synonymous_variant 24/341 P4
ANKRD26ENST00000675349.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.3113G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 9/9
ANKRD26ENST00000675116.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1035G>A p.Lys345= synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 4/15

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0147
AC:
2234
AN:
152162
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00485
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0311
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0215
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0220
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0167
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0175
AC:
4350
AN:
248588
Hom.:
50
AF XY:
0.0181
AC XY:
2440
AN XY:
134854
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00530
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00759
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0377
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000278
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0249
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0131
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0218
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0209
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0233
AC:
34081
AN:
1461048
Hom.:
499
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0233
AC XY:
16903
AN XY:
726800
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00485
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00775
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0366
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0244
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0255
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0213
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0147
AC:
2231
AN:
152280
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0139
AC XY:
1035
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00486
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0311
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000579
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0211
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0220
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0166
Alfa
AF:
0.0211
Hom.:
24
Bravo
AF:
0.0141
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00982
AC:
34
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0221
EpiControl
AF:
0.0198

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-Variant was observed in a homozygous state in population databases more than expected for disease.Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder.A synonymous variant not located in a splice region.SubpopulationAllele FrequencyAllele NumberHomozygotesEuropean-Non Finnish (NFE)2.1788%112,95234European-Finnish (FIN)1.3103%21,44610Other (OTH)2.0923%6,0222Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)3.7685%10,00416African (AFR)0.5299%15,4740East Asian (EAS)0.0278%17,9600South Asian (SAS)2.4931%30,36436American (AMR)0.7595%34,3662 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 24, 2020- -
Thrombocytopenia 2 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 17, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabDec 05, 2021- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 06, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
CADD
Benign
5.4
DANN
Benign
0.56

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41299210; hg19: chr10-27323995; API