rs41299623
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_018136.5(ASPM):c.5185C>T(p.Arg1729Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00965 in 1,612,828 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 111 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1729Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018136.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPM | NM_018136.5 | c.5185C>T | p.Arg1729Trp | missense_variant | 18/28 | ENST00000367409.9 | |
ASPM | NM_001206846.2 | c.4066-7902C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPM | ENST00000367409.9 | c.5185C>T | p.Arg1729Trp | missense_variant | 18/28 | 1 | NM_018136.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00828 AC: 1257AN: 151852Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00955 AC: 2390AN: 250290Hom.: 16 AF XY: 0.0101 AC XY: 1360AN XY: 135278
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00979 AC: 14307AN: 1460858Hom.: 100 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.0101 AC XY: 7330AN XY: 726756
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00827 AC: 1257AN: 151970Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00818 AC XY: 608AN XY: 74292
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 06, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | ASPM: PM5, BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 03, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
ASPM-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 25, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at