rs41307518
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):c.3018G>T(p.Val1006=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00322 in 1,613,068 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0033 ( 24 hom. )
Consequence
PCDH15
NM_033056.4 synonymous
NM_033056.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0270
Genes affected
PCDH15 (HGNC:14674): (protocadherin related 15) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily. Family members encode integral membrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion. It plays an essential role in maintenance of normal retinal and cochlear function. Mutations in this gene result in hearing loss and Usher Syndrome Type IF (USH1F). Extensive alternative splicing resulting in multiple isoforms has been observed in the mouse ortholog. Similar alternatively spliced transcripts are inferred to occur in human, and additional variants are likely to occur. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 10-53959836-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-53959836-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 46461.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-53959836-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.027 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00198 (301/152204) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0172 (83/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0142. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 161 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR,Digenic gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCDH15 | NM_033056.4 | c.3018G>T | p.Val1006= | synonymous_variant | 23/33 | ENST00000320301.11 | NP_149045.3 | |
PCDH15 | NM_001384140.1 | c.3018G>T | p.Val1006= | synonymous_variant | 23/38 | ENST00000644397.2 | NP_001371069.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCDH15 | ENST00000320301.11 | c.3018G>T | p.Val1006= | synonymous_variant | 23/33 | 1 | NM_033056.4 | ENSP00000322604 | ||
PCDH15 | ENST00000644397.2 | c.3018G>T | p.Val1006= | synonymous_variant | 23/38 | NM_001384140.1 | ENSP00000495195 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00198 AC: 301AN: 152086Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
301
AN:
152086
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00343 AC: 861AN: 251356Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00424 AC XY: 576AN XY: 135850
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
861
AN:
251356
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
576
AN XY:
135850
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00335 AC: 4889AN: 1460864Hom.: 24 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00375 AC XY: 2725AN XY: 726784
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4889
AN:
1460864
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
2725
AN XY:
726784
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00198 AC: 301AN: 152204Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00216 AC XY: 161AN XY: 74420
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
301
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
74420
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Oct 26, 2010 | Val1006Val in exon 23 of PCDH15: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction and is presnet in dbSNP (rs41307518 - 5 submissions). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 01, 2017 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 1F Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Oct 21, 2019 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 29, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16679490) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at