rs41313699

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001099404.2(SCN5A):​c.1302C>T​(p.Phe434Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00235 in 1,612,222 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 84 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 39 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 45 hom. )

Consequence

SCN5A
NM_001099404.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.37

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN5A (HGNC:10593): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5) The protein encoded by this gene is an integral membrane protein and tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel subunit. This protein is found primarily in cardiac muscle and is responsible for the initial upstroke of the action potential in an electrocardiogram. Defects in this gene have been associated with long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3), atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and Brugada syndrome 1, all autosomal dominant cardiac diseases. Alternative splicing results in several transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
SCN5A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Brugada syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Brugada syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1E
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • familial long QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • long QT syndrome 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • sick sinus syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • progressive familial heart block, type 1A
    Inheritance: SD, AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • atrial standstill
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial atrial fibrillation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial sick sinus syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • paroxysmal familial ventricular fibrillation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • progressive familial heart block
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
  • short QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).
BP6
Variant 3-38605987-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38605987-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 48282.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.37 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0125 (1897/152292) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0434 (1804/41566). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0417. There are 39 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 878 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 39 SD,AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN5ANM_001099404.2 linkc.1302C>T p.Phe434Phe synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 28 ENST00000413689.6 NP_001092874.1 Q14524H9KVD2
SCN5ANM_000335.5 linkc.1302C>T p.Phe434Phe synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 28 ENST00000423572.7 NP_000326.2 Q14524-2Q86V90

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN5AENST00000413689.6 linkc.1302C>T p.Phe434Phe synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 28 5 NM_001099404.2 ENSP00000410257.1 H9KVD2
SCN5AENST00000423572.7 linkc.1302C>T p.Phe434Phe synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 28 1 NM_000335.5 ENSP00000398266.2 Q14524-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0124
AC:
1892
AN:
152174
Hom.:
39
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0434
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00471
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00765
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00318
AC:
790
AN:
248330
AF XY:
0.00247
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0441
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000533
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00265
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00129
AC:
1885
AN:
1459930
Hom.:
45
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00109
AC XY:
790
AN XY:
726004
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0469
AC:
1567
AN:
33398
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00273
AC:
122
AN:
44608
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26070
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39670
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000465
AC:
4
AN:
86074
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53364
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000868
AC:
5
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000522
AC:
58
AN:
1110682
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00214
AC:
129
AN:
60304
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
96
193
289
386
482
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
50
100
150
200
250
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0125
AC:
1897
AN:
152292
Hom.:
39
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0118
AC XY:
878
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0434
AC:
1804
AN:
41566
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00464
AC:
71
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000882
AC:
6
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00757
AC:
16
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
96
191
287
382
478
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0122
Hom.:
38
Bravo
AF:
0.0146
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Nov 09, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Phe434Phe in Exon 10 of SCN5A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 4.0% (136/3440) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs41313699). -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Brugada syndrome 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Feb 24, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sick sinus syndrome 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Progressive familial heart block, type 1A Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Congenital long QT syndrome Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jul 27, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Long QT syndrome 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Mar 15, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.41
CADD
Benign
8.7
DANN
Benign
0.83
PhyloP100
1.4
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41313699; hg19: chr3-38647478; API