rs41313732

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.1731C>T(p.Cys577Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00214 in 1,614,086 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 101 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 10 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 91 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.52

Variant links:

Genes affected

USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

USH2A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).

BP6

Variant 1-216292284-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-216292284-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 48474.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-216292284-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-216292284-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.52 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00133 (202/152302) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0406 (196/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.036. There are 10 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 158 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 10 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
USH2A	NM_206933.4 link	c.1731C>T	p.Cys577Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 72	ENST00000307340.8	NP_996816.3	O75445-1
USH2A	NM_007123.6 link	c.1731C>T	p.Cys577Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 21		NP_009054.6	O75445-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
USH2A	ENST00000307340.8 link	c.1731C>T	p.Cys577Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 72	1	NM_206933.4	ENSP00000305941.3	O75445-1
USH2A	ENST00000366942.3 link	c.1731C>T	p.Cys577Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 21	1		ENSP00000355909.3	O75445-2
USH2A	ENST00000674083.1 link	c.1731C>T	p.Cys577Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 73			ENSP00000501296.1	O75445-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00134

AC:

204

AN:

152184

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0410

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00469

AC:

1178

AN:

251324

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00604

AC XY:

821

AN XY:

135830

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0378

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00223

AC:

3258

AN:

1461784

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00312

AC XY:

2272

AN XY:

727182

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0351

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000351

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00288

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00133

AC:

202

AN:

152302

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00212

AC XY:

158

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000962

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0406

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000377

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000280

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0130

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Usher syndrome type 2A

Benign:3

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 04, 2023

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Jul 01, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Cys577Cys in exon 10 of USH2A: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction and is present in 3.6% (591/16512) of South Asian chromosomes b y the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs41313732). -

Retinitis pigmentosa 39

Benign:1

Nov 04, 2023

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.48

CADD

Benign

9.6

DANN

Benign

0.69

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over