rs41314153
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000033.4(ABCD1):c.1548G>A(p.Leu516Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.108 in 1,209,397 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,009 homozygotes. There are 43,448 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.085 ( 358 hom., 2839 hem., cov: 24)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.11 ( 4651 hom. 40609 hem. )
Consequence
ABCD1
NM_000033.4 synonymous
NM_000033.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.211
Genes affected
ABCD1 (HGNC:61): (ATP binding cassette subfamily D member 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the ALD subfamily, which is involved in peroxisomal import of fatty acids and/or fatty acyl-CoAs in the organelle. All known peroxisomal ABC transporters are half transporters which require a partner half transporter molecule to form a functional homodimeric or heterodimeric transporter. This peroxisomal membrane protein is likely involved in the peroxisomal transport or catabolism of very long chain fatty acids. Defects in this gene have been identified as the underlying cause of adrenoleukodystrophy, an X-chromosome recessively inherited demyelinating disorder of the nervous system. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant X-153740151-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-153740151-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 92316.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-153740151-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chrX-153740151-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.211 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.134 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCD1 | NM_000033.4 | c.1548G>A | p.Leu516Leu | synonymous_variant | 6/10 | ENST00000218104.6 | NP_000024.2 | |
ABCD1 | XM_047441917.1 | c.1604G>A | p.Cys535Tyr | missense_variant | 7/8 | XP_047297873.1 | ||
ABCD1 | XM_047441916.1 | c.1848G>A | p.Leu616Leu | synonymous_variant | 7/11 | XP_047297872.1 | ||
LOC124905226 | XR_007068350.1 | n.1397C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCD1 | ENST00000218104.6 | c.1548G>A | p.Leu516Leu | synonymous_variant | 6/10 | 1 | NM_000033.4 | ENSP00000218104.3 | ||
ABCD1 | ENST00000443684.2 | n.551G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/6 | 3 | |||||
PLXNB3-AS1 | ENST00000434284.1 | n.72-1573C>T | intron_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0852 AC: 9605AN: 112700Hom.: 358 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.0812 AC XY: 2832AN XY: 34870
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
9605
AN:
112700
Hom.:
Cov.:
24
AF XY:
AC XY:
2832
AN XY:
34870
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0953 AC: 17369AN: 182332Hom.: 578 AF XY: 0.102 AC XY: 6845AN XY: 66896
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
17369
AN:
182332
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
6845
AN XY:
66896
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.110 AC: 120818AN: 1096644Hom.: 4651 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.112 AC XY: 40609AN XY: 362150
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
120818
AN:
1096644
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
40609
AN XY:
362150
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0852 AC: 9608AN: 112753Hom.: 358 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.0813 AC XY: 2839AN XY: 34933
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
9608
AN:
112753
Hom.:
Cov.:
24
AF XY:
AC XY:
2839
AN XY:
34933
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 30, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 08, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Adrenoleukodystrophy Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 05, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Dec 16, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 12, 2020 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 24, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at