rs41316667

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):c.1821C>T(p.Val607Val) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00137 in 1,613,670 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V607V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0070 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00079 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0002680

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.87

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

COL1A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Caffey disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
osteogenesis imperfecta type 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, ClinGen
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Ehlers-Danlos/osteogenesis imperfecta syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
high bone mass osteogenesis imperfecta
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

COL1A1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 17-50192994-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50192994-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 286349.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.87 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00696 (1057/151916) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0237 (983/41426). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0225. There are 12 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 518 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1057 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL1A1	NM_000088.4 link	c.1821C>T	p.Val607Val	splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 51	ENST00000225964.10	NP_000079.2	P02452
COL1A1	XM_011524341.2 link	c.1623C>T	p.Val541Val	splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant	Exon 23 of 48		XP_011522643.1
COL1A1	XM_005257058.5 link	c.1821C>T	p.Val607Val	splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 49		XP_005257115.2
COL1A1	XM_005257059.5 link	c.958-301C>T		intron_variant	Intron 14 of 37		XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL1A1	ENST00000225964.10 link	c.1821C>T	p.Val607Val	splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 51	1	NM_000088.4	ENSP00000225964.6		P02452
COL1A1	ENST00000476387.1 link	n.170C>T		splice_region_variant, non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 9	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00694

AC:

1054

AN:

151798

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0237

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00289

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000221

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00718

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00192

AC:

482

AN:

250704

AF XY:

0.00130

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0258

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00136

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000115

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000654

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000786

AC:

1149

AN:

1461754

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000650

AC XY:

473

AN XY:

727180

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0273

AC:

913

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00116

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26112

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000580

AC:

AN:

86230

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53406

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00121

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000800

AC:

AN:

1111948

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00136

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.472

Heterozygous variant carriers

138

208

277

346

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

150

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00696

AC:

1057

AN:

151916

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00697

AC XY:

518

AN XY:

74272

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0237

AC:

983

AN:

41426

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00288

AC:

AN:

15270

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5150

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4796

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10586

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000221

AC:

AN:

67904

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00711

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.503

Heterozygous variant carriers

103

155

206

258

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00121

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00832

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Feb 27, 2024

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 24, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 11, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 24, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Infantile cortical hyperostosis;C0023931:Osteogenesis imperfecta type I;C0029456:Osteoporosis;C0268358:Osteogenesis imperfecta, perinatal lethal;C0268362:Osteogenesis imperfecta type III;C0268363:Osteogenesis imperfecta with normal sclerae, dominant form;C4551623:Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type;C5436842:Combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 1

Benign:1

Aug 02, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

Sep 24, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided

Benign:1

Oct 20, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Infantile cortical hyperostosis

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

May 02, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

5.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.93

PhyloP100

-1.9

Mutation Taster

=67/33

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00027

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.038

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over