rs41317345

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):​c.298+7C>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00241 in 1,610,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 72 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 27 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 45 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0004996
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.19

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
TILAM (HGNC:52795): (long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1969)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 17-50199746-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50199746-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 324120.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0125 (1893/151712) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0427 (1765/41366). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.041. There are 27 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 918 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1893 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL1A1NM_000088.4 linkc.298+7C>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 2 of 50 ENST00000225964.10 NP_000079.2
COL1A1XM_011524341.2 linkc.298+7C>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 2 of 47 XP_011522643.1
COL1A1XM_005257058.5 linkc.298+7C>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 2 of 48 XP_005257115.2
COL1A1XM_005257059.5 linkc.298+7C>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 2 of 37 XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL1A1ENST00000225964.10 linkc.298+7C>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 2 of 50 1 NM_000088.4 ENSP00000225964.6
COL1A1ENST00000507689.1 linkc.352+7C>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 1 of 3 2 ENSP00000460459.1
COL1A1ENST00000474644.1 linkn.417+7C>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 2 of 3 3
TILAMENST00000509943.2 linkn.-130G>T upstream_gene_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0125
AC:
1897
AN:
151600
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0428
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00871
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000884
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00960
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00365
AC:
882
AN:
241942
AF XY:
0.00260
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0444
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00578
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000102
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00168
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00136
AC:
1981
AN:
1458690
Hom.:
45
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00119
AC XY:
863
AN XY:
725608
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0421
AC:
1407
AN:
33410
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00181
AC:
81
AN:
44684
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26084
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00597
AC:
237
AN:
39686
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000325
AC:
28
AN:
86168
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52486
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00131
AC:
6
AN:
4576
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000450
AC:
50
AN:
1111392
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00286
AC:
172
AN:
60204
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
123
245
368
490
613
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
48
96
144
192
240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0125
AC:
1893
AN:
151712
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0124
AC XY:
918
AN XY:
74108
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0427
AC:
1765
AN:
41366
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00366
AC:
56
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00835
AC:
43
AN:
5150
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000623
AC:
3
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10454
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000884
AC:
6
AN:
67868
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00950
AC:
20
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
92
184
276
368
460
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00435
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.0143
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jul 23, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 27, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dec 06, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Mar 08, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Jan 31, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Infantile cortical hyperostosis Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
4.1
DANN
Benign
0.44
PhyloP100
-1.2
PromoterAI
-0.11
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00050
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0080
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41317345; hg19: chr17-48277107; API