rs4150314

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):​c.960C>T​(p.Asp320Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0116 in 1,614,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 131 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0093 ( 13 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 118 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC5
NM_000123.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.375

Publications

11 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
BIVM-ERCC5 (HGNC:43690): (BIVM-ERCC5 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) and ERCC5 (excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 5) genes on chromosome 13. The read-through transcript encodes a fusion protein that shares sequence identity with the products of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 13-102862109-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-102862109-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 522357.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.375 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00928 (1413/152232) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.018 (276/15296). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0163. There are 13 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 721 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 13 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC5NM_000123.4 linkc.960C>T p.Asp320Asp synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 15 ENST00000652225.2 NP_000114.3 P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5NM_001204425.2 linkc.2322C>T p.Asp774Asp synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 23 NP_001191354.2 R4GMW8Q59FZ7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC5ENST00000652225.2 linkc.960C>T p.Asp320Asp synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 15 NM_000123.4 ENSP00000498881.2 P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5ENST00000639435.1 linkc.2322C>T p.Asp774Asp synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 25 5 ENSP00000491742.1 R4GMW8
BIVM-ERCC5ENST00000639132.1 linkc.1635C>T p.Asp545Asp synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 24 5 ENSP00000492684.1 A0A1W2PS85

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00928
AC:
1412
AN:
152114
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00227
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00864
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00840
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0129
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0106
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00986
AC:
2478
AN:
251272
AF XY:
0.00989
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00933
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00859
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0116
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0118
AC:
17244
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
118
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0116
AC XY:
8436
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00215
AC:
72
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0114
AC:
512
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00979
AC:
256
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00458
AC:
395
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00760
AC:
406
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0189
AC:
109
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0133
AC:
14816
AN:
1112006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0112
AC:
675
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1165
2330
3495
4660
5825
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
546
1092
1638
2184
2730
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00928
AC:
1413
AN:
152232
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00969
AC XY:
721
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00226
AC:
94
AN:
41536
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0180
AC:
276
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00864
AC:
30
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00477
AC:
23
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00840
AC:
89
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0129
AC:
875
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
22
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
67
134
202
269
336
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0125
Hom.:
19
Bravo
AF:
0.00960
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0131
EpiControl
AF:
0.0150

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ERCC5: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

Jan 08, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Aug 07, 2015
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
6.5
DANN
Benign
0.25
PhyloP100
0.38
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4150314; hg19: chr13-103514459; COSMIC: COSV104673101; API