rs4150521
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_000122.2(ERCC3):c.2111C>T(p.Ser704Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00249 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S704S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000122.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00224 AC: 341AN: 152122Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00220 AC: 552AN: 251336Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00215 AC XY: 292AN XY: 135836
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00251 AC: 3675AN: 1461888Hom.: 9 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00238 AC XY: 1730AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00224 AC: 341AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00245 AC XY: 182AN XY: 74434
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:4
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28259476, 27153395, 31346352, 30256826, 16550608, 30414346, 16574953, 24728327) -
- -
- -
The ERCC3 p.Ser640Leu variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs4150521) and ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae; likely benign by Mendelics for Xeroderma pigmentosum, complementation group b and uncertain significance by CeGaT Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen). The variant was identified in control databases in 607 of 268178 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002263 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (Finnish) in 182 of 25100 chromosomes (freq: 0.007251), Other in 32 of 6702 chromosomes (freq: 0.004775), Latino in 103 of 35102 chromosomes (freq: 0.002934), European (non-Finnish) in 257 of 118038 chromosomes (freq: 0.002177), Ashkenazi Jewish in 12 of 9854 chromosomes (freq: 0.001218), African in 12 of 23604 chromosomes (freq: 0.000508) and South Asian in 9 of 30526 chromosomes (freq: 0.000295), but was not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Ser640 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
- -
ERCC3: BS2 -
Xeroderma pigmentosum group B Benign:2
- -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Xeroderma pigmentosum Benign:1
- -
ERCC3-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
not specified Other:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at