rs4151648

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000063.6(C2):​c.2200C>T​(p.Arg734Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000894 in 1,613,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R734L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0043 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00054 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

C2
NM_000063.6 missense

Scores

1
7
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.43

Publications

11 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
C2 (HGNC:1248): (complement C2) Component C2 is a serum glycoprotein that functions as part of the classical pathway of the complement system. Activated C1 cleaves C2 into C2a and C2b. The serine proteinase C2a then combines with complement factor 4b to create the C3 or C5 convertase. Deficiency of C2 has been reported to associated with certain autoimmune diseases and SNPs in this gene have been associated with altered susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. This gene localizes within the class III region of the MHC on the short arm of chromosome 6. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. Additional transcript variants have been described in publications but their full-length sequence has not been determined.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]
C2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • complement component 2 deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008217663).
BP6
Variant 6-31945298-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-31945298-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 906027.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00433 (659/152296) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0138 (575/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0129. There are 6 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 308 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
C2NM_000063.6 linkc.2200C>T p.Arg734Cys missense_variant Exon 18 of 18 ENST00000299367.10 NP_000054.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
C2ENST00000299367.10 linkc.2200C>T p.Arg734Cys missense_variant Exon 18 of 18 1 NM_000063.6 ENSP00000299367.5
ENSG00000244255ENST00000456570.5 linkc.1570+445C>T intron_variant Intron 13 of 29 2 ENSP00000410815.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00432
AC:
658
AN:
152178
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00183
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00828
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00430
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00178
AC:
439
AN:
246592
AF XY:
0.00150
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000928
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000723
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000658
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000536
AC:
783
AN:
1460752
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000457
AC XY:
332
AN XY:
726686
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0119
AC:
398
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00127
AC:
57
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00537
AC:
213
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000151
AC:
13
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52302
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000342
AC:
38
AN:
1111998
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00103
AC:
62
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
54
107
161
214
268
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00433
AC:
659
AN:
152296
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00414
AC XY:
308
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0138
AC:
575
AN:
41548
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00183
AC:
28
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00830
AC:
43
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
68040
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00426
AC:
9
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
32
64
95
127
159
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00141
Hom.:
6
Bravo
AF:
0.00502
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0159
AC:
48
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000185
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00181
AC:
213
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Jan 15, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

C2: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Complement component 2 deficiency Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Age related macular degeneration 14 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.26
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.43
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Pathogenic
33
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.14
T;.;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.41
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.38
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.94
D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0082
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
.;.;M;.
PhyloP100
1.4
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.0
D;D;D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;D;.
Vest4
0.57
MVP
0.49
MPC
0.98
ClinPred
0.035
T
GERP RS
5.8
PromoterAI
-0.062
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.24
gMVP
0.26
Mutation Taster
=53/47
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4151648; hg19: chr6-31913075; API