rs41544115

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002693.3(POLG):c.2735-15C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000714 in 1,614,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0036 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00041 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

POLG
NM_002693.3 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0660

Variant links:

Genes affected

POLG (HGNC:9179): (DNA polymerase gamma, catalytic subunit) Mitochondrial DNA polymerase is heterotrimeric, consisting of a homodimer of accessory subunits plus a catalytic subunit. The protein encoded by this gene is the catalytic subunit of mitochondrial DNA polymerase. The encoded protein contains a polyglutamine tract near its N-terminus that may be polymorphic. Defects in this gene are a cause of progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions 1 (PEOA1), sensory ataxic neuropathy dysarthria and ophthalmoparesis (SANDO), Alpers-Huttenlocher syndrome (AHS), and mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalopathy syndrome (MNGIE). Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

POLG links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).

BP6

Variant 15-89321027-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89321027-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 138751.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-89321027-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00364 (555/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0128 (534/41582). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0119. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 256 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
POLG	NM_002693.3 link	c.2735-15C>T		intron_variant	Intron 17 of 22	ENST00000268124.11	NP_002684.1	P54098E5KNU5
POLG	NM_001126131.2 link	c.2735-15C>T		intron_variant	Intron 17 of 22		NP_001119603.1	P54098E5KNU5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
POLG	ENST00000268124.11 link	c.2735-15C>T		intron_variant	Intron 17 of 22	1	NM_002693.3	ENSP00000268124.5		P54098

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00363

AC:

553

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0128

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000969

AC:

243

AN:

250840

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000656

AC XY:

AN XY:

135616

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0131

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000810

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000883

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000409

AC:

598

AN:

1461810

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000352

AC XY:

256

AN XY:

727210

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000760

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000989

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000795

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00364

AC:

555

AN:

152326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00344

AC XY:

256

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0128

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000915

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00284

Alfa

AF:

0.000403

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00440

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2018

Wong Mito Lab, Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The NM_002693.2:c.2735-15C>T (NP_002684.1:p.=) [GRCH38: NC_000015.10:g.89321027G>A] variant in POLG gene is interpretated to be a Benign based on ACMG guidelines (PMID: 25741868). This variant meets the following evidence codes reported in the ACMG-guideline. BS1:The minor allele frequency of this allele is high for Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4A (Alpers type). BS2:Observation of the variant in controls is inconsistent with penetrance of Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4A (Alpers type). BP4:Computational evidence/predictors indicate no impact on the POLG structure, function, or protein-protein interaction. Based on the evidence criteria codes applied, the variant is suggested to be Benign. -

not specified

Benign:1

Sep 09, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.80

CADD

Benign

0.36

DANN

Benign

0.60

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.0

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over