rs41561818
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.4259C>T(p.Ala1420Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00391 in 1,614,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0031 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0040 ( 22 hom. )
Consequence
POLE
NM_006231.4 missense
NM_006231.4 missense
Scores
1
4
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.88
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009625912).
BP6
Variant 12-132643868-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132643868-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 220758.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-132643868-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr12-132643868-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00311 (474/152302) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00391 (266/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00352. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 259 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 22 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.4259C>T | p.Ala1420Val | missense_variant | 33/49 | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.4259C>T | p.Ala1420Val | missense_variant | 33/49 | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00311 AC: 474AN: 152184Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
474
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00349 AC: 878AN: 251382Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00339 AC XY: 461AN XY: 135886
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
878
AN:
251382
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
461
AN XY:
135886
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00399 AC: 5838AN: 1461830Hom.: 22 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00383 AC XY: 2787AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5838
AN:
1461830
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2787
AN XY:
727218
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00311 AC: 474AN: 152302Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00348 AC XY: 259AN XY: 74470
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
474
AN:
152302
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
259
AN XY:
74470
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
14
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
17
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
26
ExAC
AF:
AC:
379
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 08, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Feb 20, 2018 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 19, 2021 | Variant summary: POLE c.4259C>T (p.Ala1420Val) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0035 in 251382 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 246 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in POLE causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (1.4e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.4259C>T in individuals affected with Colorectal Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 11, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2024 | POLE: BS2 - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Apr 03, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Dec 08, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 18, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The POLE p.Ala1420Val variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs41561818) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae and GeneDx; as likely benign by five submitters), and MutDB databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 1011 of 277176 chromosomes (9 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.004, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Finnish in 316 of 25794 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), African in 13 of 24030 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), Other in 21 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Latino in 93 of 34410 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), European in 560 of 126680 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), Ashkenazi Jewish in 7 of 10148 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007), and South Asian in 1 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), while the variant was not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Ala1420 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
POLE-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 03, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12;C3554576:Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome;C5193036:Intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 12, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
B;B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at