Menu
GeneBe

rs41737

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000245.4(MET):c.4092G>A(p.Pro1364=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.436 in 1,613,794 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 158,361 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.35 ( 11157 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.44 ( 147204 hom. )

Consequence

MET
NM_000245.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.06
Variant links:
Genes affected
MET (HGNC:7029): (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins and the product of the proto-oncogene MET. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that are linked via disulfide bonds to form the mature receptor. Further processing of the beta subunit results in the formation of the M10 peptide, which has been shown to reduce lung fibrosis. Binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, induces dimerization and activation of the receptor, which plays a role in cellular survival, embryogenesis, and cellular migration and invasion. Mutations in this gene are associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and various head and neck cancers. Amplification and overexpression of this gene are also associated with multiple human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.33).
BP6
Variant 7-116796043-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-116796043-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 93576.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-116796043-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.06 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.456 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
METNM_000245.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4092G>A p.Pro1364= synonymous_variant 21/21 ENST00000397752.8
METNM_001127500.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.4146G>A p.Pro1382= synonymous_variant 21/21
METNM_001324402.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2802G>A p.Pro934= synonymous_variant 20/20
METXM_011516223.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.4149G>A p.Pro1383= synonymous_variant 22/22

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
METENST00000397752.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.4092G>A p.Pro1364= synonymous_variant 21/211 NM_000245.4 P3P08581-1
METENST00000318493.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.4146G>A p.Pro1382= synonymous_variant 21/211 A2P08581-2
METENST00000436117.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1697G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 20/201 P08581-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.351
AC:
53319
AN:
151892
Hom.:
11170
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.103
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.305
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.445
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.487
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.471
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.457
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.382
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.430
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.451
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.392
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.435
AC:
108397
AN:
249274
Hom.:
24780
AF XY:
0.437
AC XY:
59126
AN XY:
135226
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0920
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.519
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.487
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.459
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.460
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.394
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.447
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.457
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.444
AC:
649708
AN:
1461784
Hom.:
147204
Cov.:
60
AF XY:
0.446
AC XY:
324023
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0895
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.511
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.490
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.490
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.455
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.399
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.451
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.441
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.351
AC:
53295
AN:
152010
Hom.:
11157
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.353
AC XY:
26216
AN XY:
74284
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.103
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.445
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.487
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.471
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.456
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.382
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.451
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.387
Alfa
AF:
0.433
Hom.:
29496
Bravo
AF:
0.346
Asia WGS
AF:
0.415
AC:
1444
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.452
EpiControl
AF:
0.450

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 30, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 19, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 97 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
Renal cell carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 18, 2016Variant summary: The MET c.4146G>A (p.Pro1382Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide with 5/5 splice prediction tools predicting no significant effect on splicing. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 51284/120730 (1/ no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE site of ***. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 51284/120730 control chromosomes (1/2, 11610 homozygotes), which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic MET variant of 1/666666. In addition, multiple reputable clinical laboratories cite the variant as "benign." Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.33
Cadd
Benign
0.40
Dann
Benign
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41737; hg19: chr7-116436097; COSMIC: COSV59255944; API