rs42427
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.5034G>A(p.Gly1678=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.63 in 1,613,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 322,713 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.60 ( 28272 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.63 ( 294441 hom. )
Consequence
APC
NM_000038.6 synonymous
NM_000038.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.493
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 5-112840628-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112840628-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 42243.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-112840628-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.493 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.799 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | NM_000038.6 | c.5034G>A | p.Gly1678= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000257430.9 | NP_000029.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.5034G>A | p.Gly1678= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | ENSP00000257430 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.605 AC: 91862AN: 151912Hom.: 28255 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
91862
AN:
151912
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.652 AC: 163051AN: 249920Hom.: 54165 AF XY: 0.652 AC XY: 88074AN XY: 135128
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
163051
AN:
249920
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
88074
AN XY:
135128
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.632 AC: 923861AN: 1461444Hom.: 294441 Cov.: 58 AF XY: 0.634 AC XY: 460903AN XY: 727040
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
923861
AN:
1461444
Hom.:
Cov.:
58
AF XY:
AC XY:
460903
AN XY:
727040
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.605 AC: 91931AN: 152030Hom.: 28272 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.606 AC XY: 45044AN XY: 74326
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
91931
AN:
152030
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
45044
AN XY:
74326
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2616
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 16, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 01, 2008 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 18, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Dec 21, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 21, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The c.5034G>A, p.Gly1678Gly silent variant, located in exon 14 of APC, is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction, is listed in dbSNP (rs_id: rs42427) as a common polymorphism. Based on the above information, this is a benign variant. - |
APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Familial colorectal cancer Other:1
other, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Systems Biology Platform Zhejiang California International NanoSystems Institute | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at