rs42490
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_003821.6(RIPK2):c.483+789G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.598 in 151,632 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27,677 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain risk allele (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.60 ( 27677 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
RIPK2
NM_003821.6 intron
NM_003821.6 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.275
Publications
41 publications found
Genes affected
RIPK2 (HGNC:10020): (receptor interacting serine/threonine kinase 2) This gene encodes a member of the receptor-interacting protein (RIP) family of serine/threonine protein kinases. The encoded protein contains a C-terminal caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD), and is a component of signaling complexes in both the innate and adaptive immune pathways. It is a potent activator of NF-kappaB and inducer of apoptosis in response to various stimuli. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.692 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIPK2 | NM_003821.6 | c.483+789G>A | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 10 | ENST00000220751.5 | NP_003812.1 | ||
| RIPK2 | NM_001375360.1 | c.72+789G>A | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 9 | NP_001362289.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.598 AC: 90629AN: 151512Hom.: 27640 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
90629
AN:
151512
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.598 AC: 90713AN: 151632Hom.: 27677 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.595 AC XY: 44080AN XY: 74134 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
90713
AN:
151632
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
44080
AN XY:
74134
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
28936
AN:
41414
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
7720
AN:
15208
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
1488
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
2386
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
2067
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
6677
AN:
10558
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
194
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
39598
AN:
67700
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1239
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1834
3667
5501
7334
9168
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
752
1504
2256
3008
3760
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1599
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain risk allele
Submissions summary: Other:1
Revision: no assertion criteria provided
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Leprosy, susceptibility to, 1 Other:1
Jun 10, 2022
Centro Dermatológico Federico Lleras Acosta, Hospital Universitario Centro Dermatológico Federico Lleras Acosta
Significance:Uncertain risk allele
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:case-control
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.