rs4252303
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001558.4(IL10RA):c.337G>A(p.Val113Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00926 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 98 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001558.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL10RA | NM_001558.4 | c.337G>A | p.Val113Ile | missense_variant | 3/7 | ENST00000227752.8 | NP_001549.2 | |
IL10RA | XM_047426882.1 | c.277G>A | p.Val93Ile | missense_variant | 3/7 | XP_047282838.1 | ||
IL10RA | XM_047426884.1 | c.-81+1088G>A | intron_variant | XP_047282840.1 | ||||
IL10RA | NR_026691.2 | n.541G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL10RA | ENST00000227752.8 | c.337G>A | p.Val113Ile | missense_variant | 3/7 | 1 | NM_001558.4 | ENSP00000227752 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00629 AC: 957AN: 152164Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00680 AC: 1709AN: 251400Hom.: 11 AF XY: 0.00652 AC XY: 886AN XY: 135902
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00956 AC: 13982AN: 1461826Hom.: 93 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00939 AC XY: 6827AN XY: 727216
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00628 AC: 957AN: 152282Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00611 AC XY: 455AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inflammatory bowel disease 28 Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 09, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Nov 10, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Jun 17, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2024 | IL10RA: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
IL10RA-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 09, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at