rs4263699
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: )
Consequence
Unknown
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
No conservation score assigned
Publications
0 publications found
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.93).
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|
Frequencies
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
We have no GnomAD4 genomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.