rs4280262
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001136472.2(LITAF):āc.274A>Gā(p.Ile92Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.196 in 1,613,820 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33,324 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001136472.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LITAF | NM_001136472.2 | c.274A>G | p.Ile92Val | missense_variant | 3/4 | ENST00000622633.5 | NP_001129944.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LITAF | ENST00000622633.5 | c.274A>G | p.Ile92Val | missense_variant | 3/4 | 1 | NM_001136472.2 | ENSP00000483114.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.157 AC: 23901AN: 151960Hom.: 2259 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.166 AC: 41592AN: 250932Hom.: 4051 AF XY: 0.167 AC XY: 22714AN XY: 135608
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.200 AC: 292273AN: 1461742Hom.: 31064 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.198 AC XY: 143685AN XY: 727160
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.157 AC: 23907AN: 152078Hom.: 2260 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.154 AC XY: 11428AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 27, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Inherited Neuropathy Consortium | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 01, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25342198, 24668782) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at