Menu
GeneBe

rs431825304

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.3226G>A(p.Val1076Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000104 in 1,447,398 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1076A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000010 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:12B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.472
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.053991824).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3226G>A p.Val1076Ile missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3226G>A p.Val1076Ile missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000414
AC:
1
AN:
241606
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
130632
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000171
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000104
AC:
15
AN:
1447398
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00000418
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
718242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000709
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000109
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 29, 2023The p.V1076I variant (also known as c.3226G>A), located in coding exon 10 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 3226. The valine at codon 1076 is replaced by isoleucine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration was detected in a cohort of suspected hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) Portuguese families (Peixoto A et al. Clin Genet, 2015 Jul;88:41-8). This alteration was also detected in a cohort of 1864 men with prostate cancer diagnosed between 36 and 88 years of age (Kote-Jarai Z et al. Br J Cancer, 2011 Oct;105:1230-4). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthOct 17, 2022This missense variant replaces valine with isoleucine at codon 1076 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in a family with a history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 21952622) and an individual affected with prostate cancer (PMID: 21952622). In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 1/60466 cases and 2/53461 unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_002985). This variant has been identified in 1/241606 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 12, 2021- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 01, 2012- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthMay 23, 2023This missense variant replaces valine with isoleucine at codon 1076 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in a family with a history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 21952622) and an individual affected with prostate cancer (PMID: 21952622). In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 1/60466 cases and 2/53461 unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_002985). This variant has been identified in 1/241606 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoApr 17, 2023The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0000041 (1/241606 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals or families with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 24916970 (2015)) or prostate cancer (PMID: 21952622 (2011)). In a large-scale breast cancer association study, this variant was observed in one individual with breast cancer as well as unaffected control individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 26, 2020Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Also known as c.3454G>A; Observed in individuals with a personal or family history including breast and/or ovarian cancer (Peixoto 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24916970, 27633797) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 02, 2017Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.3226G>A (p.Val1076Ile) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 4/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. This variant is absent in 119346 control chromosomes from ExAC. This variant has been reported in HBOC or HBOC-related families/patients and individuals undergoing BRCA1/2 testing in literature (Kote-Jarai_2011, Peixoto_2014) as well as clinical databases (UMD, ClinVar) without strong evidence for pathogenicity. In two instances, this variant was found to co-occur with other deleterious variants [BRCA2 c.3159delA (p.Asp1054IlefsX6) (UMD) and BRCA2 p.Ser871X (internal sample)], strongly suggesting for a benign outcome. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories in ClinVar have classified this variant as uncertain significance, however without evidence to independently evaluate. Taken together, this variant is classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 04, 2022- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 20, 2023This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 1076 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Val1076Ile). This variant is present in population databases (rs431825304, gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of BRCA2-related conditions (PMID: 21952622, 24916970, 27633797). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 96788). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.088
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.26
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
Cadd
Benign
0.054
Dann
Benign
0.56
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.047
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.036
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.054
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.92
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.69
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.033
Sift
Benign
0.58
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.54
T;T
Vest4
0.16
MutPred
0.25
Loss of catalytic residue at V1076 (P = 0.0175);Loss of catalytic residue at V1076 (P = 0.0175);
MVP
0.50
MPC
0.019
ClinPred
0.019
T
GERP RS
-4.3
gMVP
0.082

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs431825304; hg19: chr13-32911718; API